Dover Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Name: Dover Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
Address: 112 Dover Drive, Georgetown, KY, 40324, US
Telephone: 5028639529

112 Dover Drive, Georgetown, KY 40324 · Scott County · 85 certified beds · avg 79 residents/day · certified since Jul 14, 1991

Part of chain: BLUEGRASS HEALTH KY (15 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$163,742

Fines, last 3 years

3.03

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 13, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 1, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Mar 19, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 19, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Mar 19, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 19, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Dec 13, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 13, 2023	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency.
Dec 13, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Dec 13, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 13, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 4).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	23	1	G ▲
2024	2	0	F
2026	4	0	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $163,742.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Dec 13, 2023	Fine	$163,742

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Kentucky avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.03	3.71	3.95	bottom 23% in Kentucky; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.46	0.74	0.69	bottom 24% in Kentucky; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.75	3.27	3.50	bottom 30% in Kentucky; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.50	0.53	0.48	top 40% in Kentucky; top 33% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	58.6	46.4	45.8	bottom 15% in Kentucky; bottom 18% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	60.0	41.8	42.9	bottom 21% in Kentucky; bottom 22% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.04, RN 0.62, weekend 3.66. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Dover Manor Operations Holdings LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	01/01/2023
Fischel, Mayer	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	33%	01/01/2023
Grinspan, Eli	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	33%	01/01/2023
Alvarado, Ralph	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2023
Baker, Shannon	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2024
Dover Manor Realty Holdings LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Dover Manor Realty LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Farkovits, Joshua	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/30/2025
Fischel, Mayer	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Fischel, Mayer	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Grinspan, Eli	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Grinspan, Eli	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Grinspan, Eli	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Huntington Bank	Organization	5% or Greater Mortgage Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Rayburn, Natasha	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/31/2023
Valley Stream Operator I LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Valley Stream Operator I LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/23/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
"How often do you evaluate your nurse aides and what ongoing training do they receive?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"Where do you post the contact information for the state agency and the ombudsman, in case we ever need to file a complaint?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Signature Healthcare of Georgetown	2.0 mi	Georgetown, KY	★★☆☆☆	2/5
The Willows at Citation	9.3 mi	Lexington, KY	★★★★☆	3/5
The Home Place at Midway	10.1 mi	Midway, KY	★★★☆☆	2/5
Cambridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center	11.1 mi	Lexington, KY	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Homestead Post Acute	11.3 mi	Lexington, KY	★★★★☆	3/5
Pine Meadows Post Acute	11.4 mi	Lexington, KY	★★☆☆☆	3/5
Lexington Country Place	12.2 mi	Lexington, KY	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
The Willows at Hamburg	13.9 mi	Lexington, KY	★★★☆☆	2/5
Bourbon Heights Nursing Home	14.3 mi	Paris, KY	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	SFF
Mayfair Manor	15.0 mi	Lexington, KY	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Lexington Premier Nursing & Rehab	15.1 mi	Lexington, KY	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Cedar Ridge Health Campus	15.8 mi	Cynthiana, KY	★★★★★	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Georgetown →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185295.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Dover Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

112 Dover Drive, Georgetown, KY 40324 · 5028639529

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 1/5· Fines (3y): $163,742

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Dec 13, 2023 (F-0600, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
☐ "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
☐ "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
☐ "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
☐ "How often do you evaluate your nurse aides and what ongoing training do they receive?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "Where do you post the contact information for the state agency and the ombudsman, in case we ever need to file a complaint?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 185295 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)