Coral Bay at Pensacola, LLC
600 W Gregory St, Pensacola, FL 32502 · Escambia County · 210 certified beds · avg 181 residents/day · certified since Apr 11, 2003
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Jan 19, 2026 · F-0584
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Why it matters: An unsafe or unclean environment affects residents' health, comfort, and dignity every single day.
Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Jan 19, 2026 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Jan 19, 2026 · F-0835
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.
Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Jan 19, 2026 · F-0836
The facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards.
Why it matters: A facility operating outside the law may be cutting corners that affect resident safety and care.
Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Jan 19, 2026 · F-0837
The facility did not have a proper governing body legally responsible for its policies and operations, or that body failed to appoint a properly licensed administrator to manage the facility.
Why it matters: Weak leadership and accountability at the top often show up as problems in residents' daily care.
Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Jan 19, 2026 · F-0865
The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Why it matters: Without a real quality improvement process, the same care problems tend to repeat instead of getting fixed.
Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Jan 19, 2026 · F-0908
The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Why it matters: Broken essential equipment can directly endanger residents' health, comfort, and safety.
Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (35)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Feb 12, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint |
| Jan 19, 2026 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide | The facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide | The facility did not have a proper governing body legally responsible for its policies and operations, or that body failed to appoint a properly licensed administrator to manage the facility. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide | The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Oct 26, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide enough space and equipment to meet each resident's needs. · from a complaint |
| May 25, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| May 25, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 23).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 25 | 7 | L ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $108,665.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2026 | Fine | $108,665 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.38 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 19% in Florida; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.69 | bottom 46% in Florida; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.86 | 3.68 | 3.50 | top 25% in Florida; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.37 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 35% in Florida; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 46.4 | 41.4 | 45.8 | bottom 38% in Florida; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 34.8 | 46.0 | 42.9 | top 28% in Florida; top 38% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.78, RN 0.56, weekend 3.33. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bamberger, Joshua | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 24% | 09/01/2024 |
| Coral Bay Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 09/01/2022 |
| Ganzweig, Shabsi | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 09/01/2024 |
| Jek Irrv Tr II | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 24% | 09/01/2022 |
| NMJ Irrv Tr II | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 22% | 09/01/2022 |
| Zytman, Shmuel | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 24% | 09/01/2022 |
| Bamberger, Joshua | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Bamberger, Joshua | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Bamberger, Rochel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Breitowitz, Rachel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Coral Bay Realty Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Coral Bay Rehab Realty LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/19/2025 |
| Denapoles, Christopher | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Denapoles, Christopher | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Denapoles, Christopher | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Ganzweig, Shabsi | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Ganzweig, Shabsi | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Jakobovits, Nathan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Jek Irrv Tr II | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Kagan, Jeffrey | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
- "Can you tell me about this citation and confirm your license and compliance status today?"
- "Who owns and governs this facility, and how long has the current administrator been here?"
- "How does your quality improvement program work, and can you share a recent example of a problem you found and fixed?"
- "How do you inspect and maintain essential equipment, and how quickly are repairs made?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arabella Health & Wellness of Pensacola | 1.5 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Gulf Valor Rehabilitation by Harborview | 2.1 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Havens at Pensacola, the | 3.9 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Pensacola Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 4.4 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center | 5.8 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Pensacola | 6.8 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Bay Breeze Rehabilitation by Harborview | 6.8 mi | Gulf Breeze, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Olive Branch Health and Rehabilitation Center | 6.9 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Solaris Healthcare Pensacola | 7.0 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Specialty Health and Rehabilitation Center | 7.2 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Willowbrooke Court at Azalea Trace | 8.7 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Aviata at University Hills | 8.7 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 106051.