600 W Gregory St, Pensacola, FL 32502 (opens Google Maps) · Escambia County · (850) 437-3131· 210 certified beds · avg 181 residents/day · certified since Apr 11, 2003 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · Jan 19, 2026 · F-0584
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Why it matters: An unsafe or unclean environment affects residents' health, comfort, and dignity every single day.
Severity (L): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was widespread: a systemic or pervasive problem. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · Jan 19, 2026 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (L): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was widespread: a systemic or pervasive problem. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · Jan 19, 2026 · F-0835
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.
Severity (L): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was widespread: a systemic or pervasive problem. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · Jan 19, 2026 · F-0836
The facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards.
Why it matters: A facility operating outside the law may be cutting corners that affect resident safety and care.
Severity (L): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was widespread: a systemic or pervasive problem. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · Jan 19, 2026 · F-0837
The facility did not have a proper governing body legally responsible for its policies and operations, or that body failed to appoint a properly licensed administrator to manage the facility.
Why it matters: Weak leadership and accountability at the top often show up as problems in residents' daily care.
Severity (L): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was widespread: a systemic or pervasive problem. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · Jan 19, 2026 · F-0865
The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Why it matters: Without a real quality improvement process, the same care problems tend to repeat instead of getting fixed.
Severity (L): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was widespread: a systemic or pervasive problem. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · Jan 19, 2026 · F-0908
The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Why it matters: Broken essential equipment can directly endanger residents' health, comfort, and safety.
Severity (L): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was widespread: a systemic or pervasive problem. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 35 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint F-0842
The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint F-0583
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint · F-0583 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · F-0835 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread | The facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards. · F-0836 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread | The facility did not have a proper governing body legally responsible for its policies and operations, or that body failed to appoint a properly licensed administrator to manage the facility. · F-0837 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread | The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · F-0865 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 26, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide enough space and equipment to meet each resident's needs. · from a complaint · F-0907 |
| May 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 23).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 25 | 7 | L ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $108,665.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2026 | Fine | $108,665 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.38 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 19% in Florida; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.69 | bottom 46% in Florida; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.86 | 3.68 | 3.50 | top 25% in Florida; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.37 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 35% in Florida; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 46.4 | 41.4 | 45.8 | bottom 38% in Florida; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 34.8 | 46.0 | 42.9 | top 28% in Florida; top 38% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.78, RN 0.56, weekend 3.33.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.78 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Coral Bay at Pensacola, LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bamberger, Joshua | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 24% | 09/01/2024 |
| Coral Bay Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 09/01/2022 |
| Ganzweig, Shabsi | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 09/01/2024 |
| Jek Irrv Tr II | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 24% | 09/01/2022 |
| NMJ Irrv Tr II | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 22% | 09/01/2022 |
| Zytman, Shmuel | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 24% | 09/01/2022 |
| Bamberger, Joshua | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Bamberger, Joshua | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Bamberger, Rochel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Breitowitz, Rachel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Coral Bay Realty Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Coral Bay Rehab Realty LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/19/2025 |
| Denapoles, Christopher | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Denapoles, Christopher | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Denapoles, Christopher | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Ganzweig, Shabsi | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Ganzweig, Shabsi | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Jakobovits, Nathan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Jek Irrv Tr II | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Kagan, Jeffrey | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
Showing 20 of 30 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 10 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arabella Health & Wellness of Pensacola | 1.5 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Gulf Valor Rehabilitation by Harborview | 2.1 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Havens at Pensacola, the | 3.9 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Pensacola Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 4.4 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center | 5.8 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Pensacola | 6.8 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Bay Breeze Rehabilitation by Harborview | 6.8 mi | Gulf Breeze, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Olive Branch Health and Rehabilitation Center | 6.9 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Solaris Healthcare Pensacola | 7.0 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Specialty Health and Rehabilitation Center | 7.2 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Willowbrooke Court at Azalea Trace | 8.7 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Aviata at University Hills | 8.7 mi | Pensacola, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Escambia, FL — 16 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 106051.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details