Vincentian Home

Name: Vincentian Home
Address: 111 PERRYMONT ROAD, Pittsburgh, PA, 15237, US
Telephone: 4123665600

111 Perrymont Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15237 · Allegheny County · 106 certified beds · avg 88 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.97

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (34)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
May 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
May 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
May 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
May 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not follow the rules about disclosing who owns it, or did not tell the state agency about changes in ownership or key administrative staff.
May 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Apr 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Apr 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
May 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 31, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out.
May 31, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
May 31, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 31, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
May 31, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
May 31, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 31, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 31, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 31, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 9, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Oct 27, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint
Oct 27, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 11).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2023	2	D
2024	10	E
2025	9	D
2026	13	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Pennsylvania avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.97	3.94	3.95	top 39% in Pennsylvania; top 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.21	0.80	0.69	top 13% in Pennsylvania; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.77	3.58	3.50	top 32% in Pennsylvania; top 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	1.24	0.56	0.48	top 5% in Pennsylvania; top 3% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	40.2	44.5	45.8	top 37% in Pennsylvania; top 37% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	40.0	39.9	42.9	bottom 48% in Pennsylvania; top 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.27, RN 1.30, weekend 4.06. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Azzara, Christopher	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2016
Baker, Thomas	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	09/07/2023
Ball, Craig	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	09/28/2023
Beckett, Christine	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2017
Bellin, Elaine	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2018
English, Kathleen	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2019
Hart, Terence	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2011
Koman, Christopher	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/26/2025
Owrey, Dean	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2021
Owrey, Dean	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2021
Romito, Samantha	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/15/2023
Romito, Samantha	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/26/2025
Severin, Antoinette	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2018
Strano, Amy	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/03/2020
Vincentian Collaborative System	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/17/1995
Wall, Rachel	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	02/27/2020
Wolf, Debra	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/17/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
"Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
"How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Highland Hills Post Acute	0.7 mi	Pittsburgh, PA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
John J Kane Regional Center-Ro	1.3 mi	Pittsburgh, PA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Perry Health & Rehab Center	2.3 mi	Wexford, PA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Little Sisters of the Poor	4.8 mi	Pittsburgh, PA	★★☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Caring Heights Community Care & Rehab Ctr	5.5 mi	Coraopolis, PA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Masonic Village at Sewickley	5.7 mi	Sewickley, PA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Harmony Hills Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	5.8 mi	Wexford, PA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Concordia at RP Home	6.4 mi	Pittsburgh, PA	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Spring Hill Rehabilitation and Nursing Center	6.6 mi	Pittsburgh, PA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuseSFF
Canterbury Place	7.5 mi	Pittsburgh, PA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
St Barnabas Nursing Home	7.8 mi	Gibsonia, PA	★★★★☆	3/5
Concordia at Rebecca Residence	8.0 mi	Allison Park, PA	★★★★☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Pittsburgh →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395034.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Vincentian Home

111 Perrymont Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15237 · 4123665600

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 2/5 · ▲ FEDERAL ABUSE CITATION FLAG· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
☐ "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
☐ "How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 395034 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)