How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Longwood at Oakmont
500 Route 909, Verona, PA 15147 (opens Google Maps) · Allegheny County · (412) 826-5900· 44 certified beds · avg 43 residents/day · certified since Oct 26, 1992 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE NETWORK (5 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 18, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.44
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 29 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint F-0761
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
View all 29 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Feb 18, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Feb 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Feb 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not verify that its nurse aides had completed their required training, or did not retrain aides who had been out of nurse aide work for 2 years. · F-0729 |
| Feb 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · F-0745 |
| Feb 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Feb 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · F-0622 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · F-0808 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Dec 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Dec 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Dec 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
| Dec 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Dec 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| May 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 7).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 10 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 9 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityPennsylvania averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.44
Pennsylvania average: 3.94
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.84
Pennsylvania average: 0.80
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 5.00
Pennsylvania average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.44 | 3.94 | 3.95 | top 7% in Pennsylvania; top 8% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.84 | 0.80 | 0.69 | top 4% in Pennsylvania; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.00 | 3.58 | 3.50 | top 8% in Pennsylvania; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.41 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 3% in Pennsylvania; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 43.4 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 47% in Pennsylvania; top 46% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 44.0 | 39.9 | 42.9 | bottom 39% in Pennsylvania; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.06, RN 1.71, weekend 4.65.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.06 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Longwood at Oakmont. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boslau, Todd | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/25/2020 |
| Boslau, Todd | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/25/2020 |
| Boslau, Todd | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/25/2020 |
| Boslau, Todd | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/25/2020 |
| Donovan, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/24/2023 |
| Gray, Roberta | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Gregory, Michael | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/11/2020 |
| Haden, Bobbi | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2021 |
| Haden, Bobbi | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/10/2017 |
| Haden, Bobbi | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/10/2017 |
| Haden, Bobbi | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/10/2017 |
| Harrison, Douglass | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2010 |
| Lockett, Monica | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2016 |
| Lockett, Monica | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2016 |
| Marschik, Annemarie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/23/2024 |
| Pieffer, James | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/1991 |
| Presbyterian Seniorcare | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1990 |
| Presbyterian Seniorcare | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1990 |
| Saunders, Rosanne | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/15/2020 |
| Sullivan, Barbara | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/05/2013 |
Showing 20 of 22 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 2 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Presbyterian Seniorcare Network — 5 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Manchester Commons of Presbyterian Seniorcare — Erie, PA · overall 5/5
- Shenango Presbyterian Seniorcare — New Wilmington, PA · overall 5/5
- Southmont of Presbyterian Seniorcare — Washington, PA · overall 2/5abuse
- Willows of Presbyterian Senior — Oakmont, PA · overall 1/5abuse
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
- "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
- "How do you confirm each aide's training and certification before they start caring for residents?"
- "Who provides social services here, and how would they support my family member's emotional and social needs?"
- "How does your quality committee work, and can you share an example of a problem it identified and fixed?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 43% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 22 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 64 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seneca Place | 0.8 mi | Verona, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Willows of Presbyterian Senior | 2.3 mi | Oakmont, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Harmar Village Health & Rehab Center | 3.5 mi | Cheswick, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Southwestern Veterans Center | 3.6 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Burgh Care Center | 4.4 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Champion City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 4.6 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Wecare at Monroeville Rehabilitation and Nsg Ctr | 4.8 mi | Monroeville, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| East End Health & Rehab Center | 4.8 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lgar Health and Rehabilitation | 5.5 mi | Turtle Creek, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Ivy Park Post Acute | 5.9 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Concordia at the Cedars | 6.0 mi | Monroeville, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Harmony Physical Rehabilitation | 6.0 mi | Monroeville, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Allegheny, PA — 52 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Masonic Village at Sewickley — Sewickley, PA · overall 3/5
- Meadowcrest Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center — Bethel Park, PA · overall 1/5
- Monroeville Post Acute — Monroeville, PA · overall 1/5
- Perry Health & Rehab Center — Wexford, PA · overall 1/5
- Providence Point Healthcare Residence — Pittsburgh, PA · overall 5/5
- Rehabilitation Center at Jefferson Hills, the — Jefferson Hills, PA · overall 2/5
- Riverside Health & Rehab Center — McKeesport, PA · overall 1/5
- Rose Meadows Health & Rehab Center — Pittsburgh, PA · overall 1/5abuse
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395882.