PennsylvaniaVerona

Longwood at Oakmont

500 Route 909, Verona, PA 15147 · Allegheny County · 44 certified beds · avg 43 residents/day · certified since Oct 26, 1992

Part of chain: PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE NETWORK (5 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.44
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Apr 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 18, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not verify that its nurse aides had completed their required training, or did not retrain aides who had been out of nurse aide work for 2 years.
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Dec 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Dec 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Dec 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
May 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Feb 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024100E
2025100D
202690E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityPennsylvania avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.443.943.95top 7% in Pennsylvania; top 8% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.840.800.69top 4% in Pennsylvania; top 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.003.583.50top 8% in Pennsylvania; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.410.560.48top 3% in Pennsylvania; top 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.444.545.8top 47% in Pennsylvania; top 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)44.039.942.9bottom 39% in Pennsylvania; bottom 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.06, RN 1.71, weekend 4.65. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Boslau, ToddIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/25/2020
Boslau, ToddIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/25/2020
Boslau, ToddIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/25/2020
Boslau, ToddIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/25/2020
Donovan, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/24/2023
Gray, RobertaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Gregory, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/11/2020
Haden, BobbiIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/14/2021
Haden, BobbiIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2017
Haden, BobbiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2017
Haden, BobbiIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2017
Harrison, DouglassIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/14/2010
Lockett, MonicaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2016
Lockett, MonicaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2016
Marschik, AnnemarieIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/23/2024
Pieffer, JamesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/28/1991
Presbyterian SeniorcareOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1990
Presbyterian SeniorcareOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1990
Saunders, RosanneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/15/2020
Sullivan, BarbaraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/05/2013

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Seneca Place0.8 miVerona, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Willows of Presbyterian Senior2.3 miOakmont, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Harmar Village Health & Rehab Center3.5 miCheswick, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Southwestern Veterans Center3.6 miPittsburgh, PA★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Burgh Care Center4.4 miPittsburgh, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Champion City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center4.6 miPittsburgh, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Wecare at Monroeville Rehabilitation and Nsg Ctr4.8 miMonroeville, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
East End Health & Rehab Center4.8 miPittsburgh, PA★★★☆☆2/5
Lgar Health and Rehabilitation5.5 miTurtle Creek, PA★★★★☆4/5
Ivy Park Post Acute5.9 miPittsburgh, PA★★☆☆☆1/5
Concordia at the Cedars6.0 miMonroeville, PA★★★★★5/5
Harmony Physical Rehabilitation6.0 miMonroeville, PA★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Verona →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395882.