16 Windsor Ave, Plainfield, CT 06374 (opens Google Maps) · Northeastern Ct County · (860) 564-4081· 90 certified beds · avg 83 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1986 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 19, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 15, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 19, 2026 · F-0697 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 15, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 23, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 7, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 25 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jun 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| May 19, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| May 19, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0697 |
| Oct 23, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Nov 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Nov 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Jun 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jun 30, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Jun 30, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 30, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Nov 8, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Nov 8, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Nov 8, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Nov 8, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Nov 8, 2019 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Nov 8, 2019 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 8).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 4 | 2 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $12,735.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2025 | Fine | $12,735 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Connecticut avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.46 | 3.80 | 3.95 | top 20% in Connecticut; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.94 | 0.70 | 0.69 | top 20% in Connecticut; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.07 | 3.43 | 3.50 | top 17% in Connecticut; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.54 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 26% in Connecticut; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 48.1 | 37.4 | 45.8 | bottom 16% in Connecticut; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 35.3 | 38.6 | 42.9 | top 43% in Connecticut; top 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.06, RN 0.86, weekend 3.71.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.06 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Colonial Health & Rehab Center of Plainfield, LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Regional context: $525.78/day — Connecticut statewide average for a semi-private nursing-facility room, September 30, 2025. This is a historical regional figure, not this facility's price or a prediction. View the OPM source.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colonial Health & Rehab LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/29/2012 |
| Darigan, Robert | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/29/2012 |
| Rodowicz, Curtis | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/29/2012 |
| 508 Pomfret Street LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| Aa Northeast LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/11/2024 |
| Alessandro, Joseph | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| Alessandro, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| Alessandro, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| Coleman, Faith | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Colonial Health & Rehab LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/29/2012 |
| Darigan, Robert | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/29/2012 |
| Darigan, Robert | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/28/2012 |
| Darigan, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/28/2019 |
| Family First Ar of Plainfield LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/28/2019 |
| Family First Ar of Plainfield LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/28/2019 |
| Family First Ar of Plainfield LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/28/2019 |
| Favorite Healthcare Staffing LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/22/2023 |
| Greystone Funding Company LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2019 |
| HDC Care Solutions LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| HDC Care Solutions LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2025 |
Showing 20 of 26 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 6 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Villa Maria Nursing and Rehabilitation Community | 0.2 mi | Plainfield, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Pierce Memorial Baptist Home, INC. | 7.3 mi | Brooklyn, CT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Davis Place | 9.1 mi | Danielson, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Douglas Manor | 12.7 mi | Windham, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Alpine Nursing Home INC | 13.1 mi | Coventry, RI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Norwich Sub-Acute and Nursing | 13.1 mi | Norwich, CT | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Westview Health Care Center | 14.0 mi | Dayville, CT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Saint Josephs Living Center INC | 14.1 mi | Windham, CT | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Vanderman Place | 16.3 mi | Willimantic, CT | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Apple Rehab Uncasville | 16.4 mi | Uncasville, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Coventry Operations Ri LLC DBA Respiratory and Reh | 16.8 mi | Coventry, RI | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| Matulaitis Rehabilitation & Skilled Care | 17.3 mi | Putnam, CT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075310.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details