ConnecticutDayville

Westview Health Care Center

150 Ware Rd, Dayville, CT 06241 · Northeastern Ct County · 103 certified beds · avg 100 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1974

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.29
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Feb 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Feb 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Feb 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough staff with the right skills to meet the mental and behavioral health needs of its residents, such as those living with dementia or depression.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not bring in qualified outside professionals to provide a required service when it didn't have a qualified professional on staff.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not designate a physician to serve as medical director — the doctor responsible for overseeing resident care policies and coordinating medical care across the facility.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or maintain an effective training program for its direct care staff, including training on how to communicate effectively with residents.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate its staff on residents' rights and the facility's responsibilities toward residents. Staff can only respect rights they've been taught about.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not include required infection control training — with written standards, policies, and procedures — as part of its infection prevention program.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide its staff with training in compliance and ethics — teaching employees the laws and ethical standards that govern how residents must be treated.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide its staff with required training on behavioral health — caring for residents with conditions like dementia, depression, or other mental health needs.
Oct 3, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Dec 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 25).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201930D
202210E
2025260E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityConnecticut avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.293.803.95top 23% in Connecticut; top 29% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.030.700.69top 15% in Connecticut; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.713.433.50top 25% in Connecticut; top 33% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.660.460.48top 17% in Connecticut; top 19% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)41.037.445.8bottom 33% in Connecticut; top 39% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.038.642.9top 26% in Connecticut; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.98, RN 0.95, weekend 3.44. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Czermak, ChaimIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%07/18/1974
Czermak, MarvinIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest25%07/18/1974
Katz, IsabelleIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest13%07/18/1974
Katz, MauriceIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest13%07/18/1974
Czermak, ChaimIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/23/1974
Czermak, MarvinIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/23/1974
Katz, IsabelleIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/23/1974
Katz, MauriceIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/23/1974
Panteleakos, DavidIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE07/18/1974
Panteleakos, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/27/2001
Panteleakos, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/27/2001

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Matulaitis Rehabilitation & Skilled Care3.2 miPutnam, CT★★★★★5/5
Davis Place5.0 miDanielson, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5
Pierce Memorial Baptist Home, INC.7.8 miBrooklyn, CT★★★★★4/5
Overlook Nursing and Rehabilitation Center10.0 miPascoag, RI★★★☆☆3/5
Bayberry Commons10.5 miPascoag, RI★★☆☆☆3/5
Crystal Lake Rehabilitation and Care Center10.6 miPascoag, RI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Webster Manor Rehabilitation & Health Care Center10.7 miWebster, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Lanessa Extended Care10.7 miWebster, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Brookside Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center12.5 miWebster, MA★★☆☆☆3/5
Colonial Health & Rehab Center of Plainfield, LLC14.0 miPlainfield, CT★★★★☆4/5
Villa Maria Nursing and Rehabilitation Community14.2 miPlainfield, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5
Greenville Operations Ri LLC DBA Greenville Skille15.3 miGreenville, RI★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Dayville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075078.