Colonial Health & Rehab Center of Plainfield, LLC

Name: Colonial Health & Rehab Center of Plainfield, LLC
Address: 16 WINDSOR AVE, Plainfield, CT, 06374, US
Telephone: 8605644081

16 Windsor Ave, Plainfield, CT 06374 · Northeastern Ct County · 90 certified beds · avg 83 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1986

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$12,735

Fines, last 3 years

4.46

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 19, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 15, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 19, 2026 · F-0697 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 15, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 23, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 7, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 8, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jun 8, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 19, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 19, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Oct 23, 2025	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Nov 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Nov 8, 2024	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Nov 8, 2024	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Jun 26, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 30, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Jun 30, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 30, 2022	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 8, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Nov 8, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Nov 8, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Nov 8, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Nov 8, 2019	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Nov 8, 2019	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 8).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2019	6	0	D
2022	3	0	D
2024	11	0	E
2025	1	1	G ▲
2026	4	2	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $12,735.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Oct 23, 2025	Fine	$12,735

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Connecticut avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.46	3.80	3.95	top 20% in Connecticut; top 24% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.94	0.70	0.69	top 20% in Connecticut; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.07	3.43	3.50	top 17% in Connecticut; top 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.54	0.46	0.48	top 26% in Connecticut; top 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	48.1	37.4	45.8	bottom 16% in Connecticut; bottom 42% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	35.3	38.6	42.9	top 43% in Connecticut; top 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.06, RN 0.86, weekend 3.71. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Colonial Health & Rehab LLC	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/29/2012
Darigan, Robert	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/29/2012
Rodowicz, Curtis	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/29/2012
508 Pomfret Street LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2023
Aa Northeast LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/11/2024
Alessandro, Joseph	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2023
Alessandro, Joseph	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2023
Alessandro, Joseph	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2023
Coleman, Faith	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2024
Colonial Health & Rehab LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/29/2012
Darigan, Robert	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	12/29/2012
Darigan, Robert	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	09/28/2012
Darigan, Robert	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/28/2019
Family First Ar of Plainfield LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Security Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/28/2019
Family First Ar of Plainfield LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/28/2019
Family First Ar of Plainfield LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/28/2019
Favorite Healthcare Staffing LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/22/2023
Greystone Funding Company LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Mortgage Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2019
HDC Care Solutions LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2023
HDC Care Solutions LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/15/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Villa Maria Nursing and Rehabilitation Community	0.2 mi	Plainfield, CT	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Pierce Memorial Baptist Home, INC.	7.3 mi	Brooklyn, CT	★★★★★	4/5
Davis Place	9.1 mi	Danielson, CT	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Douglas Manor	12.7 mi	Windham, CT	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Alpine Nursing Home INC	13.1 mi	Coventry, RI	★★★★☆	4/5
Norwich Sub-Acute and Nursing	13.1 mi	Norwich, CT	★★★★☆	4/5
Westview Health Care Center	14.0 mi	Dayville, CT	★★★☆☆	2/5
Saint Josephs Living Center INC	14.1 mi	Windham, CT	★★★☆☆	3/5
Vanderman Place	16.3 mi	Willimantic, CT	★★★☆☆	3/5
Apple Rehab Uncasville	16.4 mi	Uncasville, CT	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Coventry Operations Ri LLC DBA Respiratory and Reh	16.8 mi	Coventry, RI		—/5	abuseSFF
Matulaitis Rehabilitation & Skilled Care	17.3 mi	Putnam, CT	★★★★★	5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Plainfield →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075310.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Colonial Health & Rehab Center of Plainfield, LLC

16 Windsor Ave, Plainfield, CT 06374 · 8605644081

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $12,735

Most serious findings on record:

▲ May 19, 2026 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ May 19, 2026 (F-0697, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
▲ Oct 23, 2025 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
☐ "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 075310 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)