MissouriClinton

Clinton Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

1009 East Ohio, Clinton, MO 64735 · Henry County · 120 certified beds · avg 70 residents/day · certified since Oct 11, 1984

Part of chain: CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES (36 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$83,041
Fines, last 3 years
3.52
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 10, 2025 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 17, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (31)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 26, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint
Mar 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Feb 10, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Feb 10, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have an agreement with at least one Medicare- or Medicaid-certified hospital to ensure residents can be transferred quickly when they need hospital care. · from a complaint
Feb 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint
Feb 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Feb 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Sep 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Sep 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Sep 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Sep 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Sep 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Sep 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Sep 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Sep 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jan 6, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training.
Jan 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jan 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jan 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Sep 13, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Sep 13, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Sep 13, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Sep 13, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 13, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 13, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Sep 13, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care.
Sep 13, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201980E
202350E
2024110E
202571J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $83,041, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 10, 2025Fine$83,041
Feb 10, 2025Payment Denial25 days from Mar 20, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.523.663.95bottom 46% in Missouri; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.220.490.69bottom 12% in Missouri; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.083.223.50bottom 46% in Missouri; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.210.330.48bottom 33% in Missouri; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)82.256.045.8bottom 3% in Missouri; bottom 2% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)71.447.842.9bottom 17% in Missouri; bottom 11% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.57, RN 0.23, weekend 3.13. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Clinton Exempt TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/23/2004
Agh1 LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2016
Agh1 LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2025
Beaird, ToddIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Beaird, ToddIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Bedell, BryanIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
Bedell, DonaldIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/23/2004
Bedell, DonaldIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/23/2004
Bedell, DonaldIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/23/2004
Clinton Exempt TrustOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/23/2004
Clinton Re LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/12/2013
DCB Real Estate Partnership LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/12/2013
FG LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2016
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2021
Foster, GeorgannIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/29/2025
Foster, GeorgannIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/29/2025
Mid States INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/15/2014
Snell, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2001
Snell, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2001
Sovereign Healthcare Group LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/23/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Adair Village1.7 miClinton, MO★★★☆☆3/5
Truman Lake Manor INC16.0 miLowry City, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Windsor Rehabilitation & Health Care Center17.3 miWindsor, MO★★☆☆☆3/5
Appleton City Manor18.6 miAppleton City, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Clinton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265255.