IndianaLowell

Cedar Creek Health Campus

18275 Burr Street, Lowell, IN 46356 · Lake County · 58 certified beds · avg 55 residents/day · certified since Jul 10, 2014

Part of chain: TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES (123 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,021
Fines, last 3 years
2.98
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 5, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 26, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Jun 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · from a complaint
Mar 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Mar 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Mar 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Mar 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · from a complaint
Sep 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · from a complaint
Jun 5, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
May 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
May 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jan 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202491J ▲
2025100E
202660D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,021.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 28, 2024Fine$8,021

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIndiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.983.423.95bottom 27% in Indiana; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.750.620.69top 24% in Indiana; top 32% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.543.013.50bottom 21% in Indiana; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.810.470.48top 8% in Indiana; top 11% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)27.145.945.8top 6% in Indiana; top 10% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)28.640.442.9top 28% in Indiana; top 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.58, RN 0.90, weekend 3.05. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Hancock Regional HospitalOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/01/2014
Trilogy Healthcare Holdings INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Trilogy Investors LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Trilogy Pro Services LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
American Healthcare Reit Holdings LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
American Healthcare Reit INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Barney, LeighIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/30/2025
Bond, MariaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Bond, MariaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Clark, TimothyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2015
Clark, TimothyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2014
Daugherty, JoshuaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Daugherty, JoshuaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Davis, DavidIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/30/2025
Dyrek, ShellyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/08/2023
Dyrek, ShellyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/08/2023
Felker, DeanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2015
Felker, DeanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2014
Gahc3 Trilogy JV LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Gahc4 Trilogy JV LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Lowell Healthcare0.9 miLowell, IN★★★★★4/5
Ignite Medical Resort Crown Point LLC6.5 miCrown Point, IN★★☆☆☆1/5
Saint Anthony7.0 miCrown Point, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Colonial Nursing Home8.5 miCrown Point, IN★★☆☆☆2/5
Crown Point Health Campus10.4 miCrown Point, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville Care Center11.4 miMerrillville, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Spring Mill Health Campus11.5 miMerrillville, IN★☆☆☆☆2/5
Lincolnshire Health & Rehabilitation Center12.0 miMerrillville, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Beecher Manor Nrsg & Rehab Ctr12.0 miBeecher, IL★★☆☆☆3/5
Oak Grove Christian Retirement Village12.4 miDemotte, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Aperion Care Demotte12.8 miDemotte, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Great Lakes Healthcare Center14.2 miDyer, IN★★☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lowell →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155822.