ArizonaSacaton

Caring House

510 South Ocotillo Road, Sacaton, AZ 85147 · Pinal County · 100 certified beds · avg 81 residents/day · certified since Jun 19, 1993 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$28,695
Fines, last 3 years
0.00
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 18, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 20, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 18, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jul 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jul 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jul 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jul 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Sep 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Aug 12, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately.
Aug 12, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Aug 12, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 12, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202240E
202340D
202410D
202571J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $28,695, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 18, 2025Fine$13,260
Nov 8, 2024Fine$15,435
Nov 8, 2024Payment Denial8 days from Dec 12, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)0.003.973.95
Registered Nurse hours0.000.690.69
Weekend total nurse staffing0.003.503.50
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.000.490.48
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.045.245.8
RN turnover (%)0.043.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 0.00, RN 0.00, weekend 0.00. Staffing rating: —/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Government - Federal

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Gila River Health Care CorporationOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/05/2015
Chandran, SaiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Chandran, SaiIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Goddard, RussellIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Goddard, RussellIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Haake, MaxIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/11/2016
Horton, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/25/2015
Kramer, DarcyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/19/2019
McFarland, KimberlyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/09/2026
McFarland, KimberlyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/09/2026
Soto, LindaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2022
Soto, LindaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Oasis Pavilion Nursing & Rehabilitation Center12.4 miCasa Grande, AZ★★★★☆4/5
The Center at Val Vista, LLC14.3 miGilbert, AZ★★★★★5/5
Wellsprings of Gilbert15.0 miGilbert, AZ★★★★★5/5
Archstone Care Center16.8 miChandler, AZ★★★★★4/5
Sante of Chandler16.8 miChandler, AZ★★★★★4/5
Desert Cove Nursing Center17.0 miChandler, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Chandler Post Acute and Rehabilitation17.1 miChandler, AZ★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Sacaton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035216.