2200 Harden Street, Columbia, SC 29203 (opens Google Maps) · Richland County · (803) 737-5300· 308 certified beds · avg 84 residents/day · certified since Oct 3, 1997 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · Apr 18, 2025 · F-0880
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.
Severity (L): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was widespread: a systemic or pervasive problem. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 12, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 18, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 5, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Sep 19, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 7, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 6 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. F-0692
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2025 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 18, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Sep 19, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 3 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 2 | 1 | L ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
3 fines totaling $59,779.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2025 | Fine | $42,759 |
| Mar 18, 2024 | Fine | $8,827 |
| Sep 19, 2023 | Fine | $8,193 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | South Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 7.54 | 4.08 | 3.95 | top 1% in South Carolina; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 2.05 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 3% in South Carolina; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.87 | 3.55 | 3.50 | top 3% in South Carolina; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.12 | 0.41 | 0.48 | top 3% in South Carolina; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 34.6 | 45.9 | 45.8 | top 21% in South Carolina; top 23% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 35.1 | 42.1 | 42.9 | top 41% in South Carolina; top 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.40, RN 1.74, weekend 4.98.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (6.40 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for C M Tucker Jr Nursing Care Center Roddey Pavilio. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - State
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina Dept of Mental Health Accounting Office | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2006 |
| Bellamy, Versie | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2016 |
| Morgan, Robert | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2016 |
| Turner, Tracy | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2012 |
All 4 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C M Tucker Jr Nursing Care Center Fewell and Stone | 0.0 mi | Columbia, SC | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Pruitthealth- Columbia | 1.2 mi | Columbia, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Forest Acres Post Acute | 1.3 mi | Columbia, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| White Oak Manor - Columbia | 1.8 mi | Columbia, SC | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Midlands Health & Rehabilitation Center | 1.9 mi | Columbia, SC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Still Hopes Episcopal Retirement Community | 3.4 mi | West Columbia, SC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Millennium Post Acute Rehabilitation | 4.8 mi | West Columbia, SC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Opus Post Acute Rehabilitation | 5.3 mi | West Columbia, SC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| NHC Healthcare - Lexington | 5.6 mi | West Columbia, SC | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| NHC Healthcare - Parklane | 5.6 mi | Columbia, SC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Presbyterian Home of South Carolina-Columbia | 6.0 mi | Lexington, SC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| St Andrews Operator, LLC | 6.3 mi | Columbia, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Richland, SC — 14 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425360.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details