How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
3150 Gershwin Drive, Green Bay, WI 54311 (opens Google Maps) · Brown County · (920) 391-4700· 63 certified beds · avg 60 residents/day · certified since Dec 29, 2007 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. F-0553
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · F-0553 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Sep 8, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Sep 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Sep 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Sep 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Sep 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Wisconsin avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 6.01 | 4.29 | 3.95 | top 5% in Wisconsin; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.99 | 1.01 | 0.69 | top 43% in Wisconsin; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.00 | 3.84 | 3.50 | top 10% in Wisconsin; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.52 | 0.68 | 0.48 | bottom 37% in Wisconsin; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 24.3 | 46.9 | 45.8 | top 6% in Wisconsin; top 6% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 39.7 | 42.9 | top 24% in Wisconsin; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.69, RN 0.77, weekend 3.90.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.69 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Brown Cty Comm Treatment Ctr-Bayshore Village. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - County
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| County of Brown | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/10/2009 |
| County of Brown | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/10/2009 |
| Gruber, Kara | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/06/2022 |
| Gruber, Kara | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/06/2022 |
| Oak Medical SC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/29/2022 |
| Ramnanan, Keshni | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/29/2022 |
| Ramnanan, Keshni | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/29/2022 |
All 7 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edenbrook of Green Bay | 0.7 mi | Green Bay, WI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Odd Fellow Home | 5.1 mi | Green Bay, WI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Serenity Spring Senior Living at Green Bay | 6.6 mi | Green Bay, WI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Green Bay Health Services | 6.9 mi | Green Bay, WI | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Woodside Lutheran Home | 8.1 mi | Green Bay, WI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Rennes Health and Rehab Center-De Pere | 9.5 mi | De Pere, WI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Anna John Resident Centered Care Community | 12.3 mi | Oneida, WI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Good Shepherd Services LTD | 19.8 mi | Seymour, WI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525693.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details