OhioYoungstown

Briarfield Manor

461 South Canfield Niles Road, Youngstown, OH 44515 · Mahoning County · 91 certified beds · avg 73 residents/day · certified since Nov 28, 1990

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.84
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 5, 2025 · F-0697

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 25, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (36)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Aug 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Mar 5, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Mar 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 23, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jun 23, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 23, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Jun 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jun 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jun 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jun 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jun 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them.
Jun 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jun 23, 2022C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Jul 18, 2019F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Jul 18, 2019F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Jul 18, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jul 18, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 18, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts.
Jul 18, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died.
Jul 18, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 18, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jul 18, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (11 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201990F
2022110F
2025131G ▲
202630E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.843.453.95top 20% in Ohio; top 47% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.460.600.69bottom 31% in Ohio; bottom 31% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.513.073.50top 18% in Ohio; top 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.330.420.48bottom 37% in Ohio; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)46.648.745.8top 44% in Ohio; bottom 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.343.942.9top 31% in Ohio; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.72, RN 0.44, weekend 3.40. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Diane J. Reese Family Trust IOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Edward J. Reese Family Trust IOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Edward J. Reese Family Trust IOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Reese, DianeIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%01/01/2008
Reese, DianeIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Reese, EdwardIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%01/01/2008
Reese, EdwardIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Chaffin, Mary BethIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/16/2023
Chaffin, Mary BethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/16/2023
Cox, JenniferIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2003
Cox, JenniferIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2003
Diane J. Reese Family Trust IOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Edm Management, INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2003
Edm Management, INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2003
Edward J. Reese Family Trust IOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Farmers National Bank CanfieldOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2015
Farmers National Bank CanfieldOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2015
Ferguson, KevinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/10/2023
Ferguson, KevinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/10/2023
Hill, Barth & King LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2004

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Briarfield at Ashley Circle1.4 miYoungstown, OH★★★★☆4/5
Aventura at Humility House1.9 miAustintown, OH★★☆☆☆2/5
Austinwoods Rehab Health Care2.1 miAustintown, OH★★★★☆4/5
Austintown Healthcare Center2.7 miYoungstown, OH★★★★★4/5
Omni Manor Nursing Home3.3 miYoungstown, OH★★★★☆3/5
Canfield Healthcare Center3.8 miYoungstown, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Vista Center at the Ridge3.9 miMineral Ridge, OH★★☆☆☆2/5
Canfield Acres LLC DBA Windsor House at Canfield5.4 miCanfield, OH★★★★☆4/5
Windsor Health Care Center5.6 miYoungstown, OH★★★★☆3/5
Oasis Center for Rehabilitation and Healing5.7 miYoungstown, OH★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Youngstown →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365822.