How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Blossom Nursing and Rehab Center
109 Blossom Lane, Salem, OH 44460 (opens Google Maps) · Columbiana County · (330) 337-3033· 100 certified beds · avg 88 residents/day · certified since Nov 24, 1998 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ATRIUM CENTERS (26 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 11, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Dec 9, 2022
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.45
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 9, 2022 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 9, 2022 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 5, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint F-0760
The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. F-0644
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. F-0690
View all 22 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Sep 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. · from a complaint · F-0568 |
| Sep 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · from a complaint · F-0569 |
| Dec 9, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Dec 9, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Dec 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Dec 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Dec 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Dec 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| Dec 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 9, 2020 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Jan 9, 2020 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 9, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jan 9, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jan 9, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jan 9, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 3).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2023
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2022 | 9 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityOhio averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.45
Ohio average: 3.45
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.60
Ohio average: 0.60
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.01
Ohio average: 3.07
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.45 | 3.45 | 3.95 | top 40% in Ohio; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.69 | top 39% in Ohio; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.01 | 3.07 | 3.50 | top 44% in Ohio; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.48 | top 40% in Ohio; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.7 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 22% in Ohio; top 30% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 28.6 | 43.9 | 42.9 | top 25% in Ohio; top 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.37, RN 0.59, weekend 2.94.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.37 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Blossom Nursing and Rehab Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amicus Capital Holdings INC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Amicus Capital Holdings, INC. Employee Stock Ownership Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/18/2021 |
| Atrium Centers, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Orion Operating Services LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 08/10/2007 |
| Paredes, Miguel | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/08/2021 |
| Albright Ross, Susan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/24/2017 |
| Albright Ross, Susan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2018 |
| Albright Ross, Susan | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/03/2026 |
| Albright Ross, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2018 |
| Amicus Capital Holdings INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/18/2021 |
| Amicus Capital Holdings, INC. Employee Stock Ownership Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/18/2021 |
| Amicus Properties LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Anderson, Curt | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2025 |
| Anderson, Curt | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2025 |
| Atrium Centers Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2024 |
| Atrium Centers Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2024 |
| Bailey, Essel | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Broad River Rehabilitation | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Cherry, Jill | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Cherry, Jill | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 44 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 24 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Atrium Centers — 26 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Lexington Court Care Center — Lexington, OH · overall 4/5
- Woodside Village Care Center — Mount Gilead, OH · overall 3/5
- Frederic Nursing and Rehab Community — Frederic, WI · overall 3/5
- Mulder Health Care Facility — West Salem, WI · overall 1/5
- Prescott Nursing and Rehab Community — Prescott, WI · overall 3/5
- Tomah Nursing and Rehab — Tomah, WI · overall 2/5
- Crittenden County Health & Rehabilitation Center — Marion, KY · overall 3/5
- Salem Springlake Health & Rehabilitation Center — Salem, KY · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 25 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you manage residents' personal funds, and how often do families receive an accounting?"
- "If you manage my family member's personal funds, how often will we get statements and how quickly are funds returned?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 38% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 44 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 44 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circle of Care | 1.6 mi | Salem, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Salem North Healthcare Center | 2.1 mi | Salem, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Salem West Healthcare Center | 2.1 mi | Salem, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Auburn Skilled Nursing and Rehab | 5.0 mi | Salem, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Vista Center, the | 8.6 mi | Lisbon, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Crandall Nursing Home | 8.6 mi | Sebring, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| St Mary's Alzheimer's Center | 9.2 mi | Columbiana, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Parkside Health Care Center | 9.7 mi | Columbiana, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Canfield Acres LLC DBA Windsor House at Canfield | 10.2 mi | Canfield, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Aventura at Assumption Village | 12.0 mi | North Lima, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Bel Air Care Center | 12.1 mi | Alliance, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Willow Woods Rehabilitation and Nursing | 12.1 mi | North Lima, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Columbiana, OH — 11 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Calcutta Health Care Center — Calcutta, OH · overall 1/5
- Covington Skilled Nursing & Rehab Center — East Palestine, OH · overall 4/5
- Orchards of East Liverpool, the — East Liverpool, OH · overall 5/5
- Valley Oaks Care Center — East Liverpool, OH · overall 3/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 366169.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).