South DakotaSioux Falls

Avera Prince of Peace

4513 South Prince of Peace Place, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 · Minnehaha County · 126 certified beds · avg 121 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1992

Part of chain: AVERA HEALTH (13 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,278
Fines, last 3 years
5.89
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 3, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint
Nov 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint
Aug 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Aug 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Aug 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Aug 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Aug 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Aug 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jul 3, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 30, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320E
202420E
2025131G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,278.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jul 2, 2025Fine$8,278

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Dakota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.894.323.95top 6% in South Dakota; top 5% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.510.910.69top 3% in South Dakota; top 5% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.463.713.50top 4% in South Dakota; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.090.510.48top 2% in South Dakota; top 5% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)25.048.245.8top 1% in South Dakota; top 7% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)11.134.742.9top 6% in South Dakota; top 4% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.74, RN 1.47, weekend 5.32. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Church related

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Avera HealthOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%06/15/1992
Abourezk, SanaaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Avera HealthOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2000
Avera HealthOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2000
Avera HealthOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/18/2025
Berry, PatrickIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2025
Berry, PatrickIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/18/2025
Boschee, RyanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Bunkers, JenniferIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Chrystal, CandyceIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Costello, JosephIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2017
Curran, MaryIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Dover, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/23/2023
Fishback, VanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Gordon, JeffreyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Hill Jensen, CristinaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Kallemeyn, BrendaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Kirby, JenniferIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Knecht, RandyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Knutson, LaurieIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Avantara Norton2.6 miSioux Falls, SD—/5abuseSFF
Good Samaritan Society Luther Manor3.1 miSioux Falls, SD★★☆☆☆2/5
Bethany Home Sioux Falls3.9 miSioux Falls, SD★★★☆☆4/5
Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Center4.3 miSioux Falls, SD★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Dow Rummel Village5.0 miSioux Falls, SD★★★☆☆2/5
Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Village5.3 miSioux Falls, SD★★☆☆☆2/5
Bethany Home - Brandon9.3 miBrandon, SD★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Good Samaritan Society Canton14.3 miCanton, SD★★☆☆☆3/5
Tuff Memorial Home16.7 miHills, MN★★★★☆5/5
Palisade Healthcare Center17.5 miGarretson, SD★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Fellowship Village18.7 miInwood, IA★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Sioux Falls →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 435066.