South DakotaGarretson

Palisade Healthcare Center

920 4th St, Garretson, SD 57030 · Minnehaha County · 55 certified beds · avg 49 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1998

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP (44 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$154,946
Fines, last 3 years
3.38
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Nov 19, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Nov 20, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Apr 16, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: May 6, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 17, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 18, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 7, 2025 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 26, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 16, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 16, 2026▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Nov 19, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 17, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Aug 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Aug 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Aug 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Mar 18, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 18, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
Dec 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Mar 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Mar 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
2024111G ▲
2025113J ▲
202631H ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

4 fines totaling $154,946.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 19, 2025Fine$122,476
Sep 17, 2025Fine$8,608
Aug 7, 2025Fine$11,713
Nov 26, 2024Fine$12,149

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Dakota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.384.323.95bottom 12% in South Dakota; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.580.910.69bottom 11% in South Dakota; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.813.713.50bottom 10% in South Dakota; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.330.510.48bottom 18% in South Dakota; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)60.048.245.8bottom 17% in South Dakota; bottom 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)40.034.742.9bottom 34% in South Dakota; top 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.16, RN 0.54, weekend 2.64. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Pacific Northwest SNF Operations Holdings (SD) LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%08/31/2023
CH Pacific Northwest Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2023
Cheeks, DonaldIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2023
Cheeks, DonaldIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2023
Cheeks, DonaldIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2023
Couve Financial Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2023
Couve Financial Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/12/2025
Couve Healthcare Consulting LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2023
Couve Healthcare Consulting LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/12/2025
Evans, KaylaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2023
Evans, KaylaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2023
Evans, KaylaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2023
Herzka, YisroelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2023
Pacific Northwest Opco Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2023
Pacific Northwest Opco Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/12/2025
Palisade SNF Operations, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2023
Palisade SNF Operations, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/29/2025
Palisade SNF Realty LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/12/2025
Parker, LourdesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2023
Parker, LourdesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Bethany Home - Brandon9.3 miBrandon, SD★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Dells Nursing and Rehab Center INC13.4 miDell Rapids, SD★★★★☆4/5
Good Samaritan Society - Mary Jane Brown14.3 miLuverne, MN★☆☆☆☆2/5
MN Veterans Home-Luverne14.5 miLuverne, MN★★★★★4/5
Tuff Memorial Home15.0 miHills, MN★★★★☆5/5
Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Center16.2 miSioux Falls, SD★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Dow Rummel Village16.6 miSioux Falls, SD★★★☆☆2/5
Avera Prince of Peace17.5 miSioux Falls, SD★★★★☆3/5
Bethany Home Sioux Falls18.4 miSioux Falls, SD★★★☆☆4/5
Avantara Norton18.5 miSioux Falls, SD—/5abuseSFF
Good Samaritan Society Luther Manor18.6 miSioux Falls, SD★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Garretson →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 435115.