South DakotaSioux Falls

Dow Rummel Village

1321 W Dow Rummel St, Sioux Falls, SD 57104 · Minnehaha County · 50 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Feb 16, 2010

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$71,373
Fines, last 3 years
5.53
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 10, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 10, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has plan of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 13, 2025 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 14, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 30, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 29, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 21, 2024 · F-0806 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.

Why it matters: Ignoring allergies can be dangerous, and ignoring preferences leads residents to eat less and lose weight.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 11, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (10)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 10, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Nov 13, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Oct 30, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 21, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint
Aug 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Aug 15, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Apr 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310D
202431G ▲
202522G ▲
202641G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

4 fines totaling $71,373.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 8, 2026Fine$28,665
Oct 30, 2025Fine$17,345
Oct 30, 2025Fine$17,345
Aug 15, 2024Fine$8,018

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Dakota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.534.323.95top 14% in South Dakota; top 7% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.880.910.69top 48% in South Dakota; top 22% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.593.713.50top 20% in South Dakota; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.330.510.48bottom 19% in South Dakota; bottom 39% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)31.548.245.8top 9% in South Dakota; top 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)36.434.742.9bottom 39% in South Dakota; top 40% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.10, RN 0.82, weekend 4.24. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Garry, RichIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2009
Hahn, ChristopherIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/04/2022
Hodgson, AlanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2009
Jamison, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Kaufman, KevinIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/16/2006
Lenker, WilliamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Noordermeer, TamaraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Swedeen, HollyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Von Rosendale, DarlaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2004

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Center0.8 miSioux Falls, SD★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Bethany Home Sioux Falls2.2 miSioux Falls, SD★★★☆☆4/5
Good Samaritan Society Luther Manor2.9 miSioux Falls, SD★★☆☆☆2/5
Avantara Norton3.3 miSioux Falls, SD—/5abuseSFF
Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Village4.1 miSioux Falls, SD★★☆☆☆2/5
Avera Prince of Peace5.0 miSioux Falls, SD★★★★☆3/5
Bethany Home - Brandon10.4 miBrandon, SD★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Palisade Healthcare Center16.6 miGarretson, SD★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Dells Nursing and Rehab Center INC18.9 miDell Rapids, SD★★★★☆4/5
Good Samaritan Society Canton19.0 miCanton, SD★★☆☆☆3/5
Tuff Memorial Home19.8 miHills, MN★★★★☆5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Sioux Falls →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 435127.