ConnecticutWoodbridge

Autumn Lake Healthcare at the Willows

225 Amity Rd, Woodbridge, CT 06525 · South Central Ct County · 90 certified beds · avg 83 residents/day · certified since Feb 26, 1990

Part of chain: AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE (59 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.49
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Aug 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Aug 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Apr 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jan 10, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 10, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts.
Jan 10, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Sep 22, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Sep 22, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 22, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202130D
2024150F
202570E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityConnecticut avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.493.803.95bottom 38% in Connecticut; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.580.700.69bottom 43% in Connecticut; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.393.433.50top 43% in Connecticut; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.460.460.48top 39% in Connecticut; top 39% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)27.537.445.8top 20% in Connecticut; top 10% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)35.338.642.9top 43% in Connecticut; top 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.80, RN 0.63, weekend 3.69. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Aut Ct7 Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%11/28/2023
KC Derby Ct Al Opco JV LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/28/2023
Mongillo, PeterIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Mongillo, PeterIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Perera, ChannaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Perera, ChannaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Schwartz, MarkIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023
Schwartz, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/28/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Grimes Center3.1 miNew Haven, CT★★★★★4/5
Whitney Center3.3 miHamden, CT★★★☆☆3/5
Advanced Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation3.6 miNew Haven, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Arden Care Center4.0 miHamden, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
West Haven Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation4.1 miWest Haven, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Leeway, INC4.6 miNew Haven, CT★★★★☆5/5
Hamden Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center4.7 miHamden, CT★★★☆☆4/5
Orange Health Care Center5.0 miOrange, CT★★★★★5/5
Mary Wade Home5.2 miNew Haven, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Shady Knoll Center for Health & Rehabilitation5.6 miSeymour, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
New Haven Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC5.9 miNew Haven, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Apple Rehab West Haven5.9 miWest Haven, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Woodbridge →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075331.