5740 Dibble Road, Kingsville, OH 44048 (opens Google Maps) · Ashtabula County · (440) 224-2161· 133 certified beds · avg 114 residents/day · certified since Jun 21, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 23, 2018 · F-0757
The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Why it matters: Unneeded drugs expose residents to side effects, drowsiness, falls, and dangerous interactions.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 5, 2018 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 25, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 5, 2019 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 23, 2020 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 23, 2018 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 5, 2018 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · from a complaint F-0624
The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. F-0804
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Nov 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · from a complaint · F-0624 |
| Aug 31, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Dec 5, 2019 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Dec 5, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 5, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 5, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · F-0602 |
| Dec 5, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Dec 5, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Oct 23, 2018 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Oct 23, 2018 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Oct 23, 2018 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Oct 23, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Oct 23, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Oct 23, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Oct 23, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Oct 23, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Oct 23, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Oct 23, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Oct 23, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 11 | 2 | J ▲ |
| 2019 | 6 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $13,870.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2026 | Fine | $13,870 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.81 | 3.45 | 3.95 | top 21% in Ohio; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.30 | 0.60 | 0.69 | bottom 5% in Ohio; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.53 | 3.07 | 3.50 | top 16% in Ohio; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.15 | 0.42 | 0.48 | bottom 3% in Ohio; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 34.5 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 15% in Ohio; top 23% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 43.9 | 42.9 | top 1% in Ohio; top 1% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.88, RN 0.31, weekend 3.59.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.88 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Ashtabula County Nursing Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Other
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| County of Ashtabula | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/21/1989 |
| Al-Shahed, Abdallah | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/05/2025 |
| Cadovec, Regina | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/27/2023 |
| County of Ashtabula | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/21/1989 |
| County of Ashtabula | Organization | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/21/1989 |
| County of Ashtabula | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/11/2025 |
| Crick, Robin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/02/2023 |
| Dubic, George | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/12/2021 |
| Dubic, George | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/12/2021 |
| Ducro, J | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2017 |
| Ducro, J | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2017 |
| Frey, Mary | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/03/2025 |
| Furman, Diana | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Furman, Diana | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Kozlowski, Casey | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2018 |
| Kozlowski, Casey | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2017 |
| Nearhoof, David | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/17/2023 |
| Sallee, Donna | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/19/2007 |
| Sallee, Donna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/19/2007 |
| Toikkanen, Tammy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/1999 |
Showing 20 of 24 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 4 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country Club Ret Center I I I | 4.7 mi | Ashtabula, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Carington Park | 5.3 mi | Ashtabula, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Lake Pointe Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 7.2 mi | Conneaut, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Saybrook Landing | 8.2 mi | Ashtabula, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Jefferson Healthcare Center | 9.9 mi | Jefferson, OH | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Austinburg Nsg and Rehab Ctr | 10.8 mi | Austinburg, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pine Grove Healthcare Center | 13.9 mi | Geneva, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Geneva Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 14.3 mi | Geneva, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rae Ann Geneva | 14.8 mi | Geneva, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Madison Health Care | 17.8 mi | Madison, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cardinal Woods Skilled Nursing & Rehab Ctr | 18.3 mi | Madison, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Rolling Fields, INC | 19.9 mi | Conneautville, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Ashtabula, OH — 12 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365741.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details