Apple Ridge Care Center
100 West Thomas Avenue, Waverly, MO 64096 · Lafayette County · 60 certified beds · avg 47 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1990
Part of chain: CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES (36 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (39)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint |
| May 5, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Dec 30, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have enough staff with the right skills to meet the mental and behavioral health needs of its residents, such as those living with dementia or depression. · from a complaint |
| Dec 30, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Dec 19, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. · from a complaint |
| Jul 18, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint |
| Sep 11, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Sep 11, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. |
| Sep 11, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. |
| Sep 11, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Sep 11, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| Sep 11, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. |
| Sep 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. |
| Sep 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. |
| Sep 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. |
| Sep 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. |
| Sep 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Sep 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Sep 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials. |
| Sep 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. |
| Sep 11, 2024 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. |
| Apr 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Oct 25, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint |
| Aug 7, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Mar 2, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping. |
| Mar 2, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. |
| Mar 2, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. |
| Mar 2, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Mar 2, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. |
| Mar 2, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. |
| Mar 2, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. |
| Mar 2, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Mar 2, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 15).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 16 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.08 | 3.66 | 3.95 | bottom 25% in Missouri; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.19 | 0.49 | 0.69 | bottom 8% in Missouri; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.91 | 3.22 | 3.50 | bottom 39% in Missouri; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.17 | 0.33 | 0.48 | bottom 21% in Missouri; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 62.9 | 56.0 | 45.8 | bottom 33% in Missouri; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 47.8 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.74, RN 0.17, weekend 2.59. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circle B Enterprises Holding Company INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 03/13/1996 |
| Agh1 LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/02/2016 |
| Agh1 LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/11/2025 |
| Beaird, Todd | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Beaird, Todd | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Bedell, Donald | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/13/1996 |
| Bedell, Donald | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/13/1996 |
| Bedell, Donald | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/13/1996 |
| Chandra, Ram | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1994 |
| Chandra, Ram | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1994 |
| Davis, Dana | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/03/2025 |
| Davis, Dana | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/03/2025 |
| FG LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/02/2016 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2021 |
| Mid States INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2010 |
| Sovereign Healthcare Group LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/23/2021 |
| Sovereign Healthcare Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/06/2025 |
| Van de Ven LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2000 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What training does your staff have in dementia and behavioral health, and how many residents with these needs do you serve?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "How can my family member make private phone or video calls, and can we see where?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carroll House | 10.4 mi | Carrollton, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Life Care Center of Carrollton | 11.4 mi | Carrollton, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Meyer Care Center | 15.0 mi | Higginsville, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Lutheran Nursing Home | 15.7 mi | Concordia, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Living Center, the | 18.2 mi | Marshall, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Legendary Health Care Center | 19.2 mi | Marshall, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Riverbend Heights Health & Rehabilitation | 19.7 mi | Lexington, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265420.