MissouriLexington

Riverbend Heights Health & Rehabilitation

1221 Highway 13 South, Lexington, MO 64067 · Lafayette County · 154 certified beds · avg 82 residents/day · certified since Mar 31, 1989

Part of chain: MO OP HOLDCO, LLC (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.88
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 2, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 20, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (37)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jun 14, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 14, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Jun 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jun 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jun 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Jun 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jun 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Jun 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jan 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 2, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough staff with the right skills to meet the mental and behavioral health needs of its residents, such as those living with dementia or depression. · from a complaint
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Sep 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough staff with the right skills to meet the mental and behavioral health needs of its residents, such as those living with dementia or depression. · from a complaint
Sep 23, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 23, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Sep 23, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Sep 23, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Sep 23, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Sep 23, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 23, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Sep 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Sep 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Sep 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Sep 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Sep 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Jan 9, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jan 9, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 9, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jan 9, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jan 9, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jan 9, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 9, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (14 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202070E
2022140F
202351G ▲
2024100F
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.883.663.95top 10% in Missouri; top 15% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.510.490.69top 35% in Missouri; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.223.223.50top 13% in Missouri; top 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.310.330.48top 40% in Missouri; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.756.045.8top 7% in Missouri; top 28% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)43.847.842.9top 43% in Missouri; bottom 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.58, RN 0.38, weekend 3.10. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Geller, SethIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2022
Heitwell Holdings INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2024
Mo Holdco LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2022
Oberlander, ChaimIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2022
Reddick Wellington Investments INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2024
Redwell Holdings INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2024
Cantrell, SidneyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2022
Cantrell, SidneyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2022
Kramer, ShmuelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2022
Kramer, ShmuelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2022
Lichtenstein, EliIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2022
Lichtenstein, EliIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2022
Lichtenstein, IsaacIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2022
Mandelbaum, ChaimIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2022
Mandelbaum, ChaimIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2022
Mandelbaum, ChaimIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2022
Mo Holdco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2022
Riverbend Heights Property Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2022
Riverbend Heights Property Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2022
Thompson, AshlieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Shirkey Nursing and Rehabilitation Center8.5 miRichmond, MO★★★☆☆3/5
Meyer Care Center9.6 miHigginsville, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Odessa Health Care Center12.3 miOdessa, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Aspire Senior Living Oak Grove17.7 miOak Grove, MO★★☆☆☆4/5
Apple Ridge Care Center19.7 miWaverly, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lexington →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265358.