How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Anna Maria of Aurora
889 North Aurora Road, Aurora, OH 44202 (opens Google Maps) · Portage County · (330) 562-6171· 98 certified beds · avg 92 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 22, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Dec 9, 2024
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.60
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 9, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 9, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Dec 18, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint F-0755
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
View all 16 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jun 17, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Dec 22, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 22, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Dec 22, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 22, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Dec 22, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 22, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Dec 22, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 9, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jul 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602 |
| Aug 24, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 24, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · F-0569 |
| Dec 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Dec 12, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 7).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2025
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 2 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityOhio averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.60
Ohio average: 3.45
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.38
Ohio average: 0.60
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.18
Ohio average: 3.07
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.60 | 3.45 | 3.95 | top 30% in Ohio; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.38 | 0.60 | 0.69 | bottom 18% in Ohio; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.18 | 3.07 | 3.50 | top 32% in Ohio; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.36 | 0.42 | 0.48 | bottom 44% in Ohio; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 25.9 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 3% in Ohio; top 8% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 11.1 | 43.9 | 42.9 | top 5% in Ohio; top 4% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.32, RN 0.46, weekend 3.81.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.32 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Anna Maria of Aurora. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker, Aaron C | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Norton Bros. Holding Company | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/17/2003 |
| Norton, Christopher G | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/02/2024 |
| Norton, Robert J | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2003 |
| Am&k Realty LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/09/2015 |
| Am&k Realty LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
| Baker, Aaron C | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Baker, Aaron C | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Baker, Aaron C | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Norton Bros. Holding Company | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
| Norton, Christopher G | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/02/2024 |
| Norton, Christopher G | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Norton, Robert J | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/17/2003 |
| Norton, Robert J | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/17/2003 |
| Norton, Robert J | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2003 |
All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do you arrange eye and hearing care for residents, including appointments and equipment like glasses or hearing aids?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 26% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 15 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 101 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kensington at Anna Maria | 0.1 mi | Aurora, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Aurora Manor Special Care Cent | 2.2 mi | Aurora, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Avenue at Aurora | 2.8 mi | Aurora, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Canterbury of Twinsburg | 3.5 mi | Twinsburg, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Twinsburg Post Acute | 4.7 mi | Twinsburg, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Manor of Grande Village | 4.8 mi | Twinsburg, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Eliza at Chagrin Falls | 5.3 mi | Chagrin Falls, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Laurels of Chagrin Falls | 6.4 mi | Chagrin Falls, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Heritage Health Care Center | 7.2 mi | Oakwood Village, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Grande Oaks | 7.2 mi | Oakwood Village, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Solon Pointe at Emerald Ridge | 7.3 mi | Solon, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Avenue at Macedonia | 7.5 mi | Macedonia, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Portage, OH — 10 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Arbors at Streetsboro — Streetsboro, OH · overall 1/5
- Longmeadow Care Center — Ravenna, OH · overall 2/5
- Majestic Care of Kent — Kent, OH · overall 2/5
- Tamarack Ridge Health and Rehabilitation — Kent, OH · overall 5/5
- Woodlands Health and Rehab Center — Ravenna, OH · overall 1/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365072.