OhioNewark

Altercare Newark South INC.

17 Forry Street, Newark, OH 43055 · Licking County · 47 certified beds · avg 44 residents/day · certified since Apr 25, 2000

Part of chain: ALTERCARE (22 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$252,477
Fines, last 3 years
3.12
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 11, 2025 · F-0757 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.

Why it matters: Unneeded drugs expose residents to side effects, drowsiness, falls, and dangerous interactions.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Feb 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 20, 2025 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 9, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Nov 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · from a complaint
Nov 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
May 20, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
May 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
May 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Feb 11, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint
Feb 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Sep 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults.
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Sep 9, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 9, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 9, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 9, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202140D
202390D
202410E
2025102J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $252,477.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 20, 2025Fine$31,031
Feb 11, 2025Fine$221,446

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.123.453.95bottom 35% in Ohio; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.550.600.69top 49% in Ohio; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.773.073.50bottom 35% in Ohio; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.250.420.48bottom 19% in Ohio; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)66.748.745.8bottom 11% in Ohio; bottom 8% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)83.343.942.9bottom 4% in Ohio; bottom 4% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.43, RN 0.60, weekend 3.05. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Andrew M SchroerOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/01/2018
Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Gerald F Schroer JrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/01/2018
Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Matthew SchroerOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/01/2018
Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Margaret S GoodmanOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/01/2018
Susanne Schroer Dynasty Trust U/AOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/01/2018
The Schroer Group, INC.Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/01/2018
TSG Nursing Centers, INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%02/01/2018
Altercare of Ohio, INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2018
Film, GeorgeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2018
Goodman, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2018
Logan, JustinIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Mock, DouglasIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/20/2021
Mock, DouglasIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/20/2021
Nutter, OrianIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Arlington Care Center1.1 miNewark, OH★★★☆☆4/5
The Laurels of Heath1.5 miHeath, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Newark Nursing & Rehab1.7 miNewark, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Flint Ridge Nrsg & Rehab Ctr1.8 miNewark, OH★★★☆☆2/5
Altercare Newark North INC.3.6 miNewark, OH★★★☆☆2/5
Otterbein at Granville5.8 miGranville, OH★★★★★5/5
Altercare Thornville INC.9.9 miThornville, OH★★★☆☆2/5
Pataskala Oaks Care Center13.8 miPataskala, OH★★★☆☆2/5
Tuscany Gardens14.4 miPataskala, OH★★☆☆☆2/5
Johnstown Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center16.1 miJohnstown, OH★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Newark →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 366196.