How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
308 South Second Street, Walnut, IL 61376 (opens Google Maps) · Bureau County · (815) 379-2131· 62 certified beds · avg 40 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 2004 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ALLURE HEALTHCARE SERVICES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. F-0644
The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. F-0645
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · F-0742 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Aug 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Mar 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 7).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Illinois avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.83 | 2.99 | 3.95 | top 39% in Illinois; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.69 | top 43% in Illinois; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.48 | 2.67 | 3.50 | top 44% in Illinois; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 45% in Illinois; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.5 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 31% in Illinois; top 30% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 16.7 | 41.8 | 42.9 | top 11% in Illinois; top 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.38, RN 0.66, weekend 2.96.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.38 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Allure of Walnut. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goldberg, Jeremy | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 30% | 07/01/2023 |
| MN1 Management Corp | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 30% | 07/01/2023 |
| Nudell, Michael | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 30% | 07/01/2023 |
| Oseroff, Meyer | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 30% | 07/01/2023 |
| Wengrow, David | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 07/01/2023 |
| Goldberg, Jeremy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Meyer, Samantha | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| MN1 Management Corp | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Morris, Susan | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Nudell, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Oseroff, Meyer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Allure Healthcare Services — 15 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 14 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manor Court of Princeton | 14.4 mi | Princeton, IL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Goldwater Care Princeton | 14.9 mi | Princeton, IL | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Citadel of Sterling,the | 18.4 mi | Sterling, IL | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Allure of Sterling | 18.5 mi | Sterling, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Winning Wheels | 18.6 mi | Prophetstown, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| La Bella of Sterling | 18.9 mi | Sterling, IL | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Allure of Prophetstown | 19.7 mi | Prophetstown, IL | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Bureau, IL — 4 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 146063.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details