Allure of Geneseo
704 South Illinois Street, Geneseo, IL 61254 · Henry County · 72 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1994
Part of chain: ALLURE HEALTHCARE SERVICES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 20, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Apr 21, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (22)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jan 16, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. |
| Jan 16, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. |
| Jan 16, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. |
| Jan 16, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Jan 16, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jul 10, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint |
| Feb 27, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Feb 27, 2025 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. |
| Feb 27, 2025 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. |
| Jan 18, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Jan 18, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jan 18, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. |
| Jan 18, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. |
| Jan 18, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. |
| Jan 18, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Jan 18, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 5).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 6 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Illinois avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.84 | 2.99 | 3.95 | top 39% in Illinois; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.47 | 0.63 | 0.69 | bottom 46% in Illinois; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.56 | 2.67 | 3.50 | top 40% in Illinois; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.41 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 39% in Illinois; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 25.0 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 8% in Illinois; top 7% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.0 | 41.8 | 42.9 | top 15% in Illinois; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.37, RN 0.56, weekend 3.04. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goldberg, Jeremy | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 07/01/2019 |
| MN1 Management Corp | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 07/01/2019 |
| Nudell, Michael | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 33% | 07/01/2019 |
| Oseroff, Meyer | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 07/01/2019 |
| Allure Geneseo Property, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2020 |
| Allure Healthcare Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2020 |
| Baker, Cassandra | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/04/2019 |
| Meyer, Samantha | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| Nudell, Michael | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2019 |
| Nudell, Shira | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Do you have a qualified dietician on staff, and how involved are they in each resident's nutrition plan?"
- "Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"
- "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hillcrest Home | 1.1 mi | Geneseo, IL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Hammond-Henry District HSP | 1.1 mi | Geneseo, IL | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Avenues at Quad Cities | 14.2 mi | Silvis, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Silvis Center for Nursing Rehab & Care | 14.4 mi | Silvis, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Celebrate Sr Living of Moline | 15.1 mi | Moline, IL | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Allure of Moline | 16.0 mi | East Moline, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Hope Creek Nursing & Rehab | 16.1 mi | East Moline, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| River Valley Nursing and Rehabilitation | 16.4 mi | Pleasant Valley, IA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Arcadia Care Kewanee | 18.2 mi | Kewanee, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Vistas at Bettendorf | 18.8 mi | Bettendorf, IA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 145789.