7801 Airport Pulling Road N, Naples, FL 34109 (opens Google Maps) · Collier County · (239) 566-8077· 40 certified beds · avg 40 residents/day · certified since Jun 16, 1998 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ADVINIACARE (11 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Apr 18, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 18, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Apr 18, 2025 · F-0835 · triggered by a complaint
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 18, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Apr 18, 2025 · F-0867 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Why it matters: Without a working quality program, the same care problems tend to repeat instead of getting fixed.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 18, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Nov 25, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Dec 24, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 7, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 7, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 7, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 7, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 7, 2022 · F-0791
The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Why it matters: Dental problems left untreated cause pain, infection, and trouble eating, which can lead to weight loss.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 1, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. F-0732
The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. F-0791
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. · F-0847 |
| Apr 18, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Apr 18, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint · F-0835 |
| Apr 18, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint · F-0867 |
| Nov 25, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Aug 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. · F-0882 |
| Jul 7, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Jul 7, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Jul 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jul 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Jul 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Jul 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 8 | 3 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 3 | 3 | K ▲ |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
3 fines totaling $231,990.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2025 | Fine | $184,425 |
| Nov 25, 2024 | Fine | $10,033 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | Fine | $37,532 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.97 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 41% in Florida; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.91 | 0.76 | 0.69 | top 24% in Florida; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.86 | 3.68 | 3.50 | top 25% in Florida; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 33% in Florida; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 41.5 | 41.4 | 45.8 | top 48% in Florida; top 40% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 44% in Florida; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.55, RN 0.82, weekend 3.45.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.55 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Adviniacare at Naples. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frederick S Frankel Trust | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| 7801 Airport Pulling Road, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/10/2025 |
| Berkowitz, Benjamin | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Berkowitz, Benjamin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Berkowitz, Benjamin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Berkowitz, David | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/10/2025 |
| Boswell, Sally | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Boswell, Sally | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Curis Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| David a Berkowitz Revoc Tr David Berkowitz Ttee | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Elterman, Frank | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Elterman, Frank | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Jean, Darline | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Jean, Darline | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Labella, Caterina | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Labella, Caterina | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Labella, Caterina | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Labella, Caterina | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Meystel, Yosef | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/10/2025 |
| Pointe Group Care LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
Showing 20 of 31 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 11 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Adviniacare — 11 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 10 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solaris Senior Living North Naples | 2.2 mi | Naples, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Chateau at Moorings Park, the | 2.9 mi | Naples, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Premier Place at the Glenview | 3.0 mi | Naples, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Solaris Healthcare Imperial | 4.0 mi | Naples, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Naples Health and Rehabilitation Center | 4.4 mi | Naples, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Bentley Care Center | 5.1 mi | Naples, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Gardens at Terracina Health & Rehabilitation | 7.5 mi | Naples, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Renaissance at the Terraces | 8.2 mi | Bonita Springs, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Woodside Health and Rehabilitation Center | 8.6 mi | Naples, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Solaris Healthcare Lely Palms | 9.7 mi | Naples, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Oakton Place Health and Rehabilitation at the Arli | 10.7 mi | Naples, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Estero | 12.8 mi | Estero, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105995.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details