Rhode IslandNewport

Adviniacare Newport, LLC

398 Bellevue Avenue, Newport, RI 02840 · Newport County · 114 certified beds · avg 102 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1975 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: ADVINIACARE (11 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$16,801
Fines, last 3 years
4.15
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Sep 6, 2024 · F-0812 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Why it matters: Unsafe food handling is one of the most common causes of food poisoning, which can be dangerous for frail residents.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: Oct 1, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 6, 2024 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 1, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (42)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 19, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Dec 19, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Dec 19, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 19, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 19, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 19, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Nov 19, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Aug 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor a resident's right to choose their own attending doctor. Residents get to decide which physician oversees their care. · from a complaint
Sep 6, 2024▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Sep 6, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Sep 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Sep 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Sep 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
Sep 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Sep 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint
Sep 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · from a complaint
Sep 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Sep 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Sep 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Sep 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 13, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Sep 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults.
Sep 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Sep 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Sep 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 4, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (15 → 13).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202390F
2024162L ▲
2025150F
202620E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $16,801.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 6, 2024Fine$16,801

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityRhode Island avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.153.883.95top 26% in Rhode Island; top 34% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.960.800.69top 28% in Rhode Island; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.833.483.50top 26% in Rhode Island; top 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.620.550.48top 35% in Rhode Island; top 21% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)26.040.645.8top 9% in Rhode Island; top 8% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)27.837.942.9top 26% in Rhode Island; top 25% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.35, RN 0.77, weekend 3.08. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
1219 Limted PartnershipOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2026
257 Limted PartnershipOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2026
42170 Limted PartnershipOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2026
Benjamin Berkowitz Revocable TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/30/2026
Bider Family TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2026
Bram, TovaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2026
Braun, ShragaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/30/2026
Bunneli, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2026
Cba II, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2026
Enykri, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/30/2026
F Squared Investments, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2026
Frederick S Frankel TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2026
Goldfarb, BrianIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2026
Hamui, MorielIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2026
Joshua Hoffman TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2026
Kahan, JeromeIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2026
Katz, ShmuelIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2026
Kroll, JoetteIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2026
Leah Braun TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/30/2026
Leiner, YisroelIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2026

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
St Clare Home0.5 miNewport, RI★★★★☆5/5
Village House Nursing & Rehabilitation Center0.9 miNewport, RI★★★★☆4/5
John Clarke Senior Living2.2 miMiddletown, RI★★☆☆☆2/5
Grand Islander Center2.4 miMiddletown, RI★★☆☆☆2/5
Royal Middletown Nursing Center3.7 miMiddletown, RI★★☆☆☆2/5
Elderwood of Scallop Shell at Wakefield10.1 miSouth Kingstown, RI★★☆☆☆2/5
South County Eden Operations LLC DBA Lakeside Nurs11.0 miNorth Kingstown, RI★★★★☆4/5
Roberts Health Centre INC11.9 miNorth Kingstown, RI★★★★★4/5
Bayview Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center12.8 miNorth Kingstown, RI★★☆☆☆2/5
South Kingstown Nurs. & Rehab Ctr13.3 miWest Kingston, RI★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Saint Elizabeth Home East Greenwich14.1 miEast Greenwich, RI★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Silver Creek Rehab and Healthcare Center14.1 miBristol, RI★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Newport →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 415033.