KansasRose Hill

Advena Living at Fountainview

601 N Rose Hill Road, Rose Hill, KS 67133 · Butler County · 50 certified beds · avg 44 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1992

Part of chain: ADVENA LIVING COMMUNITIES (6 facilities, chain avg rating 1.3★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$30,566
Fines, last 3 years
4.18
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 15, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 22, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (35)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 23, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Jan 23, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Nov 15, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jan 23, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Jan 23, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jan 23, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 23, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Jan 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jan 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jan 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Jan 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jan 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving.
Jan 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Jan 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Jan 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jan 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jan 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Jun 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role.
Jun 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jun 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Jun 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jun 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (21 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202160D
2023231G ▲
202560F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $30,566, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 15, 2023Fine$30,566
Nov 15, 2023Payment Denial10 days from Dec 12, 2023

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.184.583.95bottom 39% in Kansas; top 33% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.590.810.69bottom 31% in Kansas; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.574.053.50bottom 36% in Kansas; top 39% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.410.490.48bottom 43% in Kansas; top 47% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)72.248.145.8bottom 6% in Kansas; bottom 4% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)87.542.042.9bottom 6% in Kansas; bottom 3% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.18, RN 0.45, weekend 2.71. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cghii INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Cornerstone Group Holdings INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Genuth, MikeIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Greenfield, MichaelIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
KS Host Portfolio Opco LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
MGMG Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Novotny, MichelleIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Novotny, WilliamIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Cornerstone Employment Solutions INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
McCue, TamaraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
McCue, TamaraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
New Paradigm Solutions INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
New Paradigm Solutions INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/07/2025
Novotny, MichelleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Novotny, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Ritchey, OlgaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/09/2024
Ritchey, OlgaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/09/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Derby Health & Rehabilitation, LLC5.8 miDerby, KS★★★★★5/5
Caritas Center, INC7.2 miWichita, KS★★★★★5/5
Westview of Derby Rehabilitation & Health Care Cen7.2 miDerby, KS★★☆☆☆1/5
Villa Maria8.6 miMulvane, KS★★★★★5/5
Orchard Gardens9.6 miWichita, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Regent Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare10.7 miWichita, KS★★★★★5/5
Life Care Center of Andover10.8 miAndover, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Center at Waterfront LLC10.9 miWichita, KS★★★☆☆2/5
Avita Health and Rehab at Reeds Cove11.1 miWichita, KS★★★☆☆3/5
Lincoln Care and Rehab11.1 miWichita, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Mount St Mary11.3 miWichita, KS★★★★★4/5
Medicalodges Wichita11.5 miWichita, KS★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Rose Hill →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175221.