Lakepoint Augusta, LLC

Name: Lakepoint Augusta, LLC
Address: 901 LAKEPOINT DRIVE, Augusta, KS, 67010, US
Telephone: 3167756333

901 Lakepoint Drive, Augusta, KS 67010 · Butler County · 88 certified beds · avg 72 residents/day · certified since Dec 23, 1997

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$10,361

Fines, last 3 years

3.10

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jul 31, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jul 2, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 11, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 28, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 24, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jun 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jun 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Jun 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jun 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jun 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jun 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Jun 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Jun 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Jun 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jun 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 24, 2026	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jun 24, 2026	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · from a complaint
Jul 31, 2025	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 31, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Oct 31, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Oct 31, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 31, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Oct 31, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 31, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 31, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Sep 11, 2023	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 11, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 9, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 9, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Jan 9, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jan 9, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jan 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 14).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	11	1	G ▲
2024	7	0	F
2025	1	1	J ▲
2026	14	0	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $10,361.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Jul 31, 2025	Fine	$10,361

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Kansas avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.10	4.58	3.95	bottom 7% in Kansas; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.45	0.81	0.69	bottom 12% in Kansas; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.78	4.05	3.50	bottom 7% in Kansas; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.31	0.49	0.48	bottom 20% in Kansas; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	50.7	48.1	45.8	bottom 43% in Kansas; bottom 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	33.3	42.0	42.9	top 34% in Kansas; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.17, RN 0.46, weekend 2.85. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Harrison, Warner	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	97%	07/07/2016
Baker, Lonnie	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/18/2024
Baker, Lonnie	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/24/2024
Harrison, Warner	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/24/2024
Haverkamp, Nicholas	Individual	Contracted Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	11/30/2023
Haverkamp, Nicholas	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/24/2024
Manhattan Retirement Foundation INC.	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/24/2024
Nelson, Christopher	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/18/2024
Nelson, Christopher	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/24/2024
Rapp, Krystin	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
"Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
"How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
"How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
"What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Lakepoint el Dorado, LLC	9.1 mi	El Dorado, KS	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Life Care Center of Andover	9.5 mi	Andover, KS	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuseSFF
El Dorado Care and Rehab	11.7 mi	El Dorado, KS	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Avita Health and Rehab at Reeds Cove	12.0 mi	Wichita, KS	★★★☆☆	3/5
Advena Living at Fountainview	13.1 mi	Rose Hill, KS	★★★☆☆	3/5
Caritas Center, INC	13.1 mi	Wichita, KS	★★★★★	5/5
Regent Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare	13.5 mi	Wichita, KS	★★★★★	5/5
Center at Waterfront LLC	13.7 mi	Wichita, KS	★★★☆☆	2/5
Great Plains Post Acute	15.7 mi	Wichita, KS	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Larksfield Place	15.7 mi	Wichita, KS	★★★★★	4/5
Orchard Gardens	16.3 mi	Wichita, KS	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Catholic Care Center, INC	16.4 mi	Bel Aire, KS	★★☆☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Augusta →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175424.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Lakepoint Augusta, LLC

901 Lakepoint Drive, Augusta, KS 67010 · 3167756333

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $10,361

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Jul 31, 2025 (F-0689, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Sep 11, 2023 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
☐ "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
☐ "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
☐ "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
☐ "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 175424 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)