How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Woodside Healthcare Center
2240 Northrop Ave, Sacramento, CA 95825 (opens Google Maps) · Sacramento County · (916) 927-9300· 58 certified beds · avg 55 residents/day · certified since Nov 5, 2002 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CYPRESS HEALTHCARE GROUP (13 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Nov 22, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.58
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. F-0755
The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. F-0759
View all 21 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Nov 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 3, 2021 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 3, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Dec 3, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Dec 3, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Dec 3, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 3, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Dec 3, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Dec 3, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 9).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 8 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityCalifornia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.58
California average: 4.31
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.58
California average: 0.61
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.23
California average: 3.90
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.58 | 4.31 | 3.95 | top 25% in California; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.69 | top 35% in California; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.23 | 3.90 | 3.50 | top 23% in California; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.32 | 0.51 | 0.48 | bottom 39% in California; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 23.8 | 36.7 | 45.8 | top 14% in California; top 6% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 12.5 | 38.1 | 42.9 | top 8% in California; top 6% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.42, RN 0.55, weekend 4.08.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.42 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Woodside Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cypress Healthcare Group LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2023 |
| Barkovskii, Dmitrii | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/30/2025 |
| Barkovskii, Dmitrii | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/30/2025 |
| Beam, Rebecca | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Beam, Rebecca | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Fastovich, Lyubov | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/29/2021 |
| Fastovich, Lyubov | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/29/2021 |
| Jackson, Matthew | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Jackson, Matthew | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Jackson, Matthew | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Jackson, Robert | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Jackson, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Jackson, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Klimovich, Irina | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2023 |
| Klimovich, Irina | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/16/2021 |
| Lee, Mai | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/12/2024 |
| Lee, Mai | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/12/2024 |
| Pastrano-Oclarino, Myla | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/09/2021 |
| Pastrano-Oclarino, Myla | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/09/2021 |
| Portela, Alicia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2021 |
Showing 20 of 28 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 8 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Cypress Healthcare Group — 13 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Asbury Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Sacramento, CA · overall 3/5
- Auburn Ravine Healthcare Center — Auburn, CA · overall 5/5
- College Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Sacramento, CA · overall 3/5
- Fair Oaks Healthcare Center — Fair Oaks, CA · overall 3/5
- Gold Country Health Center — Placerville, CA · overall 4/5
- Grass Valley Healthcare Center — Grass Valley, CA · overall 3/5
- Greenhaven Healthcare Center — Sacramento, CA · overall 3/5abuse
- Manzanita Healthcare Center — Carmichael, CA · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 12 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 24% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 28 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 42 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asbury Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 0.5 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sherwood Healthcare Center | 1.6 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Gramercy Court | 1.7 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Arden Park Post Acute | 2.0 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| McKinley Park Care Center | 2.8 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Saylor Lane Healthcare Center | 2.9 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Advanced Health Care of Sacramento | 2.9 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| University Post-Acute Rehab | 3.1 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Mid-Town Oaks Post-Acute | 3.3 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mission Carmichael Healthcare Center | 4.4 mi | Carmichael, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Whitney Oaks Care Center | 4.6 mi | Carmichael, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| River City Post Acute | 4.8 mi | Carmichael, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Sacramento, CA — 37 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Acc Care Center — Sacramento, CA · overall 5/5
- American River Center — Carmichael, CA · overall 4/5
- Bridgewood Post Acute — Sacramento, CA · overall 3/5abuse
- Bruceville Terrace - D/P SNF of Methodist Hospital — Sacramento, CA · overall 3/5abuse
- Capital Post Acute — Sacramento, CA · overall 2/5abuse
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555798.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).