TexasWaco

Woodland Springs Nursing Center

1010 Dallas St, Waco, TX 76704 · Mc Lennan County · 132 certified beds · avg 88 residents/day · certified since Jun 27, 1994

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: CHARLESTON HEALTHCARE GROUP (4 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
8
Serious findings on record
$92,215
Fines, last 3 years
2.92
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 2, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Feb 18, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 11, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jul 3, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jan 15, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Feb 4, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Aug 31, 2024 · F-0600

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Sep 23, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Aug 31, 2024 · F-0607

The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.

Why it matters: Without working prevention policies, mistreatment is more likely to happen and less likely to be caught.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Sep 23, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Aug 31, 2024 · F-0656

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Sep 23, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 16, 2024 · F-0580 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.

Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 16, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 2, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Dec 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 4, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Dec 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Jul 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials. · from a complaint
Jul 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · from a complaint
Jun 11, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jan 15, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 31, 2024▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Aug 31, 2024▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Aug 31, 2024▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Aug 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Aug 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 16, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jun 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jun 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
202485H ▲
2025162J ▲
202611J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

5 fines totaling $92,215, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 2, 2026Fine$12,428
May 17, 2025Fine$29,858
May 17, 2025Payment Denial14 days from Jul 10, 2025
Jan 15, 2025Fine$12,428
Aug 31, 2024Fine$28,677
Jan 16, 2024Fine$8,824

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.923.463.95bottom 19% in Texas; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.270.440.69bottom 21% in Texas; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.723.043.50bottom 32% in Texas; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.250.340.48bottom 38% in Texas; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)54.755.345.8bottom 44% in Texas; bottom 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)71.454.642.9bottom 28% in Texas; bottom 11% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.06, RN 0.28, weekend 2.85. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Broussard, KendallIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2015
Broussard, KendallIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2015
Broussard, KendallIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2013
Charleston Waco Operations, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2015
Charleston Waco Operations, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/05/2025
Gray, ArnoldIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/16/2018
Hewitt, HerbertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/10/2015
Hobbs, TyrellIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/25/2022
Lockhart, ChristinaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/27/2024
O'Neal, GlendaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/24/2012
Price, LarryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/10/2015
South Limestone Hospital DistrictOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2015
Wilson, KentIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Atrium of Bellmead0.7 miBellmead, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Ivy Creek Wellness & Rehabilitation2.2 miWaco, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Crestview Healthcare Residence3.0 miWaco, TX★★★★☆4/5
Lakeshore Village Nursing and Rehabilitation3.5 miWaco, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Avir at Jeffrey Place4.4 miWaco, TX★★★☆☆3/5
The Chateau Waco5.2 miWaco, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Greenview Nursing and Rehabilitation5.2 miWaco, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Woodway Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center6.3 miWaco, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Ridgecrest Retirement and Healthcare Community6.4 miWaco, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
St. Catherine Center7.0 miWaco, TX★★★★★4/5
St. Anthony's Care Center7.4 miWaco, TX★★★★☆4/5
Wesley Woods Health & Rehabilitation7.9 miWaco, TX★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Waco →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675360.