How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Winfield Rest Haven II, LLC
1611 Ritchie, Winfield, KS 67156 (opens Google Maps) · Cowley County · (620) 221-9290· 41 certified beds · avg 38 residents/day · certified since Jun 23, 2006 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: GRACE TEAM SERVICES (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 4, 2024
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Dec 4, 2024
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.32
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 4, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 4, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Dec 31, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
View all 11 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Dec 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Dec 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Dec 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Feb 15, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Feb 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Feb 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Feb 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Aug 25, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 5).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 5 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityKansas averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.32
Kansas average: 4.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.41
Kansas average: 0.81
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.91
Kansas average: 4.05
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Kansas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.32 | 4.58 | 3.95 | bottom 44% in Kansas; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.41 | 0.81 | 0.69 | bottom 7% in Kansas; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.91 | 4.05 | 3.50 | top 50% in Kansas; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.35 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 31% in Kansas; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.4 | 48.1 | 45.8 | top 42% in Kansas; top 49% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 42.0 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.81, RN 0.36, weekend 3.44.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.81 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Winfield Rest Haven II, LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Other
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winfield Rest Haven INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/1966 |
| Bachman, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Bird, Alvin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Bird, Alvin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Bland & Associates, P.C. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Bland & Associates, P.C. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2025 |
| Fox, Mike | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Grace Team LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Grace Team LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2025 |
| Grace, Ryan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Grace, Ryan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Howell, Kenneth | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/11/2017 |
| Huebert, Eric | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Huebert, Eric | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Lawrence, Terry | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/27/2006 |
| Lemer, Amy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/21/2022 |
| Lemer, Amy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/21/2022 |
| Lemer, Amy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2025 |
| Neal, Mike | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Turney, Lynette | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2021 |
Showing 20 of 24 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 4 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Grace Team Services — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Cheyenne County Village INC — St Francis, KS · overall 2/5
- Frankfort Community Care Home — Frankfort, KS · overall 1/5
- Logan County Senior Living INC — Oakley, KS · overall 2/5abuse
- Park Lane Nursing Home — Scott City, KS · overall 3/5
- Sterling Village — Sterling, KS · overall 3/5
- Sunporch of Smith County — Smith Center, KS · overall 5/5
- Topside Manor INC — Goodland, KS · overall 1/5
- Wheat State Manor — Whitewater, KS · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 44% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 24 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winfield Senior Living Community | 0.5 mi | Winfield, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cumbernauld Village | 1.6 mi | Winfield, KS | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Kansas Veterans Home | 2.0 mi | Winfield, KS | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Medicalodges Arkansas City | 11.0 mi | Arkansas City, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Arkansas City Presbyterian Manor | 11.0 mi | Arkansas City, KS | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175488.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).