KansasSt Francis

Cheyenne County Village INC

820 S Denison Street, St Francis, KS 67756 · Cheyenne County · 30 certified beds · avg 28 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1995 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: GRACE TEAM SERVICES (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$13,287
Fines, last 3 years
3.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 3, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Apr 18, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 3, 2024 · F-0697 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 18, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (31)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 3, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Apr 3, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Sep 28, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 28, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Sep 28, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Sep 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Sep 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Sep 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Sep 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 13, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Oct 13, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Oct 13, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Oct 13, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Oct 13, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 13, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 13, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving.
Oct 13, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Oct 13, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 13, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 13, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 13, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Oct 13, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Oct 13, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.
Oct 13, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jul 28, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jul 28, 2021C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (15 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202150E
2022150F
202390F
202422J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $13,287.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 3, 2024Fine$13,287

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.864.583.95bottom 30% in Kansas; top 46% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.680.810.69bottom 43% in Kansas; top 39% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.504.053.50bottom 34% in Kansas; top 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.640.490.48top 23% in Kansas; top 20% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)39.348.145.8top 29% in Kansas; top 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.042.042.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.91, RN 0.68, weekend 3.55. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cheyenne County Village INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/01/2018
Klepper, RodIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Carmichael, SherryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Cheyenne County Village INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
County of CheyenneOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/22/2018
Grace Team LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Grace Team LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/10/2025
Grace, RyanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Grace, RyanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
GT Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
GT Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/06/2025
Houtman, SaraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Huebert, EricIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/18/2018
Huebert, EricIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/18/2018
Keller, ThomasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Klepper, RodIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Licke, HeatherIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Licke, HeatherIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Lohr, BrookeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
McTague, DaphneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Sarah Ann Hester Memorial Home23.8 miBenkelman, NE★★☆☆☆3/5
Topside Manor INC28.6 miGoodland, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Hillcrest Care Center29.9 miWray, CO★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in St Francis →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175347.