210 E Park Lane, Scott City, KS 67871 (opens Google Maps) · Scott County · (620) 872-5871· 54 certified beds · avg 33 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 2012 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: GRACE TEAM SERVICES (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Jun 9, 2025 · F-0678 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 29, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint F-0678
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. F-0883
The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. F-0582
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint · F-0678 |
| Mar 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Mar 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Mar 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Mar 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Mar 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Mar 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Mar 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| May 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| May 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| May 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| May 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| May 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Oct 5, 2021 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · F-0865 |
| Oct 5, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Oct 5, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Oct 5, 2021 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 8).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 9 | 1 | K ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $14,901.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2025 | Fine | $14,901 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Kansas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.26 | 4.58 | 3.95 | bottom 42% in Kansas; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.61 | 0.81 | 0.69 | bottom 33% in Kansas; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.10 | 4.05 | 3.50 | top 43% in Kansas; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.40 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 41% in Kansas; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.9 | 48.1 | 45.8 | top 37% in Kansas; top 44% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 75.0 | 42.0 | 42.9 | bottom 12% in Kansas; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.45, RN 0.64, weekend 4.28.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.45 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Park Lane Nursing Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott County Rest Home INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/02/1966 |
| Compton, Steve | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Compton, Steve | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| County of Scott | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/03/1989 |
| Cupp, Christian | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Cupp, Christian | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Grace Team LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Grace Team LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/22/2025 |
| Grace, Ryan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Grace, Ryan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| GT Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| GT Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/22/2025 |
| Hendrix, Karyn | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/02/2016 |
| Hendrix, Karyn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/02/2016 |
| Hendrix, Karyn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/02/2016 |
| Hoeme, Anita | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Hoeme, Anita | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Huebert, Eric | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Huebert, Eric | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| James, Stephanie | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
Showing 20 of 33 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 13 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Grace Team Services — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wichita County Health Center LTCU | 24.9 mi | Leoti, KS | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ranch House Senior Living LLC | 33.1 mi | Garden City, KS | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Garden Valley Retirement Village | 35.0 mi | Garden City, KS | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175525.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details