KansasScott City

Park Lane Nursing Home

210 E Park Lane, Scott City, KS 67871 · Scott County · 54 certified beds · avg 33 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 2012

Part of chain: GRACE TEAM SERVICES (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$14,901
Fines, last 3 years
4.26
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jun 9, 2025 · F-0678 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: May 29, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 9, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
May 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
May 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 5, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Oct 5, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Oct 5, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 5, 2021C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202140F
202360D
202591K ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $14,901.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 9, 2025Fine$14,901

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.264.583.95bottom 42% in Kansas; top 30% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.610.810.69bottom 33% in Kansas; top 47% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.104.053.50top 43% in Kansas; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.400.490.48bottom 41% in Kansas; top 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)42.948.145.8top 37% in Kansas; top 44% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)75.042.042.9bottom 12% in Kansas; bottom 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.45, RN 0.64, weekend 4.28. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Scott County Rest Home INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%05/02/1966
Compton, SteveIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Compton, SteveIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
County of ScottOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/03/1989
Cupp, ChristianIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Cupp, ChristianIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Grace Team LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Grace Team LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/22/2025
Grace, RyanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Grace, RyanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
GT Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
GT Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/22/2025
Hendrix, KarynIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/02/2016
Hendrix, KarynIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/02/2016
Hendrix, KarynIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/02/2016
Hoeme, AnitaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Hoeme, AnitaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Huebert, EricIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Huebert, EricIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
James, StephanieIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Wichita County Health Center LTCU24.9 miLeoti, KS★★★★☆3/5
Ranch House Senior Living LLC33.1 miGarden City, KS★★★★★4/5
Garden Valley Retirement Village35.0 miGarden City, KS★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Scott City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175525.