TexasGroesbeck

Windsor Healthcare Residence

1025 W Yeagua, Groesbeck, TX 76642 · Limestone County · 90 certified beds · avg 50 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1993

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: CORYELL COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITY (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$34,232
Fines, last 3 years
3.66
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Aug 28, 2025 · F-0600

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Aug 29, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 15, 2023 · F-0678 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 16, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 20, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 21, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (12)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 28, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Aug 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Aug 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Jul 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jul 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 20, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 15, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202322J ▲
202460E
202541K ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $34,232.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 28, 2025Fine$20,216
Nov 20, 2023Fine$365
Sep 15, 2023Fine$13,651

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.663.463.95top 27% in Texas; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.400.440.69top 48% in Texas; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.363.043.50top 22% in Texas; top 50% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.210.340.48bottom 26% in Texas; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.455.345.8bottom 49% in Texas; bottom 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.054.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.31, RN 0.36, weekend 3.04. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Byrom, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2014
Coryell County Memorial Hospital AuthorityOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2014
TGR Healthcare, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2019
TGR Healthcare, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2025
Thomas, BrianIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2019
Thomas, BrianIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Groesbeck LTC Nursing and Rehabilitation1.1 miGroesbeck, TX★★★★★5/5
The Manor Healthcare Residence11.5 miMexia, TX★★★★★5/5
Mexia LTC Nursing and Rehabilitation11.7 miMexia, TX★★☆☆☆4/5
Skilled Care of Mexia11.7 miMexia, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Teague Nursing and Rehabilitation16.6 miTeague, TX★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Groesbeck →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675139.