How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Groesbeck LTC Nursing and Rehabilitation
607 Parkside Dr, Groesbeck, TX 76642 (opens Google Maps) · Limestone County · (254) 729-3245· 90 certified beds · avg 64 residents/day · certified since Jul 23, 2005 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: GULF COAST LTC PARTNERS (20 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 22, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 6 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint F-0558
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
View all 6 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 26, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 1).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityTexas averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.86
Texas average: 3.46
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.17
Texas average: 0.44
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.62
Texas average: 3.04
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.86 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 19% in Texas; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.17 | 0.44 | 0.69 | bottom 4% in Texas; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.62 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 13% in Texas; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.17 | 0.34 | 0.48 | bottom 14% in Texas; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 38.9 | 55.3 | 45.8 | top 18% in Texas; top 34% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 54.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.39, RN 0.15, weekend 3.18.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.39 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Groesbeck LTC Nursing and Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - Hospital district
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Limestone Hospital District | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 04/01/2018 |
| Bergeron, Bobby | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Bhateley, Dileep | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| East Texas III Associates, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| East Texas III Associates, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Groesbeck LTC Partners, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Groesbeck LTC Partners, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/26/2025 |
| Hyden, Dawna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Nicholson, Louis | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Price, Larry | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Gulf Coast LTC Partners — 20 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Hansford County Hospital District DBA Lakeridge Nu — Lubbock, TX · overall 2/5
- Hemphill Care Center — Hemphill, TX · overall 2/5
- Mexia LTC Nursing and Rehabilitation — Mexia, TX · overall 2/5
- Mi Casita Nursing and Rehabilitation — Lubbock, TX · overall 3/5
- Oak Village Healthcare — Lake Jackson, TX · overall 4/5
- Palo Duro Nursing Home — Claude, TX · overall 3/5
- Panola County Nursing & Rehabilitation — Carthage, TX · overall 3/5
- Teague Nursing and Rehabilitation — Teague, TX · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 19 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 39% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Windsor Healthcare Residence | 1.1 mi | Groesbeck, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| The Manor Healthcare Residence | 11.4 mi | Mexia, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Skilled Care of Mexia | 11.6 mi | Mexia, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Mexia LTC Nursing and Rehabilitation | 11.6 mi | Mexia, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Teague Nursing and Rehabilitation | 15.7 mi | Teague, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676071.