TexasMexia

Skilled Care of Mexia

501 E Sumpter St, Mexia, TX 76667 · Limestone County · 80 certified beds · avg 70 residents/day · certified since Jul 25, 2017

Part of chain: CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE (149 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$24,634
Fines, last 3 years
3.24
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 17, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 5, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Dec 31, 2024 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Nov 18, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Dec 31, 2024 · F-0692 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Nov 18, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Oct 17, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 31, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Dec 31, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint
Dec 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
May 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Apr 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Apr 6, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Apr 6, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Apr 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Apr 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202370E
202472K ▲
202521J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $24,634.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 17, 2025Fine$9,113
Dec 31, 2024Fine$15,521

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.243.463.95bottom 43% in Texas; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.260.440.69bottom 20% in Texas; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.923.043.50top 49% in Texas; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.220.340.48bottom 28% in Texas; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)97.255.345.8bottom 3% in Texas; bottom 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)88.954.642.9bottom 12% in Texas; bottom 2% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.17, RN 0.26, weekend 2.86. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Government - Hospital district

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Blake, GaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Blake, MalisaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Huggins, LindaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Mak, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/17/2021
Mexia II Enterprises, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Manor Healthcare Residence0.7 miMexia, TX★★★★★5/5
Mexia LTC Nursing and Rehabilitation0.8 miMexia, TX★★☆☆☆4/5
Teague Nursing and Rehabilitation10.7 miTeague, TX★★★★★5/5
Groesbeck LTC Nursing and Rehabilitation11.6 miGroesbeck, TX★★★★★5/5
Windsor Healthcare Residence11.7 miGroesbeck, TX★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation Center18.8 miFairfield, TX★★★★☆5/5
Fairview Healthcare Residence19.6 miFairfield, TX★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Mexia →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676427.