WisconsinRipon

Whispering Pines Nursing and Rehab, LLC

50 Wolverton Ave, Ripon, WI 54971 · Fond Du Lac County · 50 certified beds · avg 33 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1994

Part of chain: EDEN SENIOR CARE (21 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$12,649
Fines, last 3 years
3.42
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Nov 20, 2023 · F-0805 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.

Why it matters: Food served in the wrong texture can cause choking or lead residents to stop eating and lose weight.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Dec 11, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 14, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 2, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Jun 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Jun 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jun 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals. · from a complaint
Apr 14, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jan 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jan 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jan 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Jan 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 20, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · from a complaint
Nov 1, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Oct 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Oct 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202351J ▲
202550E
202671G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $12,649.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 12, 2023Fine$12,649

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityWisconsin avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.424.293.95bottom 20% in Wisconsin; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.721.010.69bottom 24% in Wisconsin; top 35% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.103.843.50bottom 24% in Wisconsin; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.530.680.48bottom 39% in Wisconsin; top 29% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)39.546.945.8top 30% in Wisconsin; top 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)54.539.742.9bottom 28% in Wisconsin; bottom 29% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.11, RN 0.86, weekend 3.72. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Lifsics, ChannieIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest9%10/01/2018
Polstein, MordechaiIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest19%10/01/2018
Stesel, MaximIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest53%10/01/2018
Mauer, DovieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Piehl, CaylaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Polstein, MordechaiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Rice, PamelaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Rice, PamelaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Juliette Manor10.0 miBerlin, WI★★★★☆4/5
Markesan Resident Home12.2 miMarkesan, WI★★★★★5/5
Edenbrook Omro13.1 miOmro, WI★★★★☆4/5
Eden Rehab Suites and Green House Homes15.9 miOshkosh, WI★★☆☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Christian Home LLC16.3 miWaupun, WI★★☆☆☆2/5
Bethel Home17.3 miOshkosh, WI★★★★★4/5
Evergreen Health Center17.7 miOshkosh, WI★★★★☆4/5
Edenbrook of Oshkosh19.9 miOshkosh, WI★★★☆☆3/5
Fond Du Lac Lutheran Home19.9 miFond Du Lac, WI★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Ripon →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525551.