How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
3100 Shore Drive, Virginia Beach, VA 23451 (opens Google Maps) · Virginia Beach City County · (757) 496-1158· 108 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since Apr 15, 1982 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. F-0554
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jan 16, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jan 16, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Jan 16, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Jan 16, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · F-0622 |
| Jan 16, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Jan 16, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 16, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 16, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jan 16, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jan 16, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jan 16, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Jan 16, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 30, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Nov 30, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Nov 30, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Nov 30, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2020 | 12 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Virginia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 7.47 | 3.67 | 3.95 | top 1% in Virginia; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.34 | 0.66 | 0.69 | top 8% in Virginia; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 6.90 | 3.21 | 3.50 | top 1% in Virginia; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.75 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 10% in Virginia; top 14% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.0 | 48.1 | 45.8 | top 39% in Virginia; bottom 50% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 45.5 | 48.2 | 42.9 | top 45% in Virginia; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.24, RN 1.12, weekend 5.76.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (6.24 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boone, Elwood | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Burroughs, Richard | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Cavanaugh, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/26/2017 |
| CCL Hospitality Group | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| CCL Hospitality Group | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2025 |
| Compo, George | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/10/2012 |
| Crenshaw, Victoria | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2017 |
| Damuth, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2024 |
| Fretwell, Julia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/30/2020 |
| Fretwell, Julia | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2025 |
| Functional Pathways of Tennessee LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2018 |
| Functional Pathways of Tennessee LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2025 |
| Haji Medical Services, PLLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Haji Medical Services, PLLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2025 |
| Hajimomenian, Amir | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Hajimomenian, Amir | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Haynes, Susan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Holder, Ian | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/1984 |
| Myers, David | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Ripley, Ronald | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
Showing 20 of 29 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 9 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bay Pointe Rehabilitation and Nursing | 4.0 mi | Virginia Beach, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bayside Health & Rehabilitation Center | 4.0 mi | Virginia Beach, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Virginia Beach Healthcare and Rehab Center | 4.1 mi | Virginia Beach, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Colonial Health & Rehab Center, LLC | 4.2 mi | Virginia Beach, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Birchwood Park Rehabilitation | 5.1 mi | Virginia Beach, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Rosemont Health & Rehab Center, LLC | 5.3 mi | Virginia Beach, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Thalia Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing | 5.4 mi | Virginia Beach, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation and Nursing | 6.1 mi | Virginia Beach, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lake Taylor Hosp | 7.5 mi | Norfolk, VA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Our Lady of Perpetual Help | 7.7 mi | Virginia Beach, VA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Waterside Health & Rehab Center | 8.1 mi | Norfolk, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Autumn Care of Norfolk | 8.4 mi | Norfolk, VA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Virginia Beach City, VA — 14 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495127.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details