How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Harmony Hills Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
194 Swinderman Road, Wexford, PA 15090 (opens Google Maps) · Allegheny County · (724) 935-3781· 55 certified beds · avg 50 residents/day · certified since Jul 29, 1993 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jul 17, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.29
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 29 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint F-0755
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. F-0553
View all 29 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · F-0553 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy. · F-0691 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 18, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 18, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 18, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 18, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. · F-0847 |
| Oct 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · F-0622 |
| Oct 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Oct 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Oct 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Oct 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Oct 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Aug 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 13).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 13
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 13 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityPennsylvania averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.29
Pennsylvania average: 3.94
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.75
Pennsylvania average: 0.80
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.03
Pennsylvania average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.29 | 3.94 | 3.95 | top 28% in Pennsylvania; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.69 | top 38% in Pennsylvania; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.03 | 3.58 | 3.50 | top 24% in Pennsylvania; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 36% in Pennsylvania; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 56.1 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 19% in Pennsylvania; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 54.5 | 39.9 | 42.9 | bottom 23% in Pennsylvania; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.05, RN 0.71, weekend 3.81.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.05 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Harmony Hills Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gem Family 2020 NGCG Nevada Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 67% | 03/19/2024 |
| Gestetner, Elliott | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 03/19/2024 |
| Limestone Enterprises LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 67% | 03/19/2024 |
| Moskowitz, Yisroel | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 30% | 03/19/2024 |
| Cam-Elm Company LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
| Capital Funding LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2024 |
| Cohen, Chaya | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
| Gestetner, Colev | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2024 |
| Gestetner, Colev | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2024 |
| Gestetner, Colev | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
| Gestetner, Colev | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
| Gestetner, Miriam | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Krohn, Simcha | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
| Meyer, Damon | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/16/2024 |
| Meyer, Damon | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
| Meyer, Damon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
| Moskowitz, Yisroel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
| Moskowitz, Yisroel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
| MTL Healthcare LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
| Ocean Fiscal Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
Showing 20 of 32 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 12 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How are residents and families included in care plan meetings, and how often do those meetings happen?"
- "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
- "If my family member's health suddenly changes, how quickly do you reassess them and update their care?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Which staff are trained in ostomy care, and how often is that care provided and checked?"
- "Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 56% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 32 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 51 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perry Health & Rehab Center | 3.5 mi | Wexford, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Cranberry Place | 3.5 mi | Cranberry Township, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| St John Specialty Care Center | 4.5 mi | Mars, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Sherwood Oaks | 5.3 mi | Cranberry Township, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| St Barnabas Nursing Home | 5.5 mi | Gibsonia, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Vincentian Home | 5.8 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Highland Hills Post Acute | 6.5 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| John J Kane Regional Center-Ro | 6.5 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Masonic Village at Sewickley | 8.6 mi | Sewickley, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Concordia at Villa St Joseph | 8.9 mi | Baden, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Concordia at Rebecca Residence | 8.9 mi | Allison Park, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Caring Heights Community Care & Rehab Ctr | 9.9 mi | Coraopolis, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Allegheny, PA — 52 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Harmony Physical Rehabilitation — Monroeville, PA · overall 5/5
- Heritage Care Center — Pittsburgh, PA · overall 1/5SFF
- Ivy Park Post Acute — Pittsburgh, PA · overall 2/5
- John J Kane Regional Center-Gl — Pittsburgh, PA · overall 2/5abuse
- John J Kane Regional Center-Mc — McKeesport, PA · overall 3/5
- John J Kane Regional Center-Sc — Pittsburgh, PA · overall 3/5abuse
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395903.