Vibra Hospital of Northern California D/P SNF
2801 Eureka Way, Redding, CA 96001 · Shasta County · 32 certified beds · avg 26 residents/day · certified since Feb 3, 1994
Part of chain: VIBRA HEALTHCARE (3 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (26)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| May 23, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). |
| May 23, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| May 23, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| May 23, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| May 23, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. |
| May 23, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. |
| May 23, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Feb 5, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint |
| Jan 14, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint |
| Mar 7, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Mar 7, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
| Mar 7, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 8).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 10 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.86 | 4.31 | 3.95 | top 5% in California; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.42 | 0.61 | 0.69 | top 4% in California; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.03 | 3.90 | 3.50 | top 6% in California; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.29 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 5% in California; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 0.0 | 36.7 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 38.1 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.09, RN 1.47, weekend 5.23. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carr, Francis | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2009 |
| Diebold, James | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2009 |
| Hollinger Holding Company LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/28/2015 |
| Hollinger, Brad | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/30/2005 |
| Vibra Healthcare, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/30/2005 |
| Ceniza-Saelee, Sheba | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/02/2014 |
| Credit Suisse Ag | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/22/2020 |
| Defillipo, Emily | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/18/2020 |
| Fegan, Clint | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/24/2005 |
| Hauck, David | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/04/2018 |
| Hollinger, Brad | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/24/2005 |
| Hollinger, Kelly | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Midcap Funding IV Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2015 |
| Niemuth, Trisha | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Stevens, Lisa | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/20/2008 |
| Vibra Management, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2008 |
| Vibra Re Redding LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/04/2018 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
- "How do you track each resident's food allergies and preferences, and what happens if they don't like what's served?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quartz Hill Post Acute | 0.9 mi | Redding, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Redding Post Acute | 1.2 mi | Redding, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| River Valley Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP | 1.4 mi | Redding, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Copper Ridge Care Center | 2.4 mi | Redding, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Crestwood Wellness and Recovery Center | 3.5 mi | Redding, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Marquis Care at Shasta | 3.8 mi | Redding, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Veterans Home of California - Redding | 6.4 mi | Redding, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Oak River Rehab | 10.9 mi | Anderson, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555588.