Oak River Rehab

Name: Oak River Rehab
Address: 3300 FRANKLIN STREET, Anderson, CA, 96007, US
Telephone: 5303650025

3300 Franklin Street, Anderson, CA 96007 · Shasta County · 143 certified beds · avg 132 residents/day · certified since Jun 10, 1982

Part of chain: PACS GROUP (274 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

5/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.78

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jan 23, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Dec 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 17, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 17, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 17, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 17, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure care was delivered by qualified people following each resident's written care plan — the individualized document that spells out exactly what care that resident is supposed to receive.
Mar 17, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Mar 17, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 2, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
May 2, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
May 2, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
May 2, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 2, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
May 2, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure care was delivered by qualified people following each resident's written care plan — the individualized document that spells out exactly what care that resident is supposed to receive.
May 2, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 2, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 2, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 3).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2019	9	E
2022	6	E
2024	3	D
2025	1	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.78	4.31	3.95	bottom 26% in California; top 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.51	0.61	0.69	top 46% in California; bottom 39% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.52	3.90	3.50	bottom 33% in California; top 41% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.53	0.51	0.48	top 28% in California; top 30% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	40.3	36.7	45.8	bottom 37% in California; top 37% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	15.4	38.1	42.9	top 12% in California; top 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.94, RN 0.53, weekend 3.67. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Bay Bridge Capital Partners, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	100%	11/05/2021
Hudson River Opco LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	11/05/2021
Apt, Frederick	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024
Hollingsworth, Gregory	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2018
Hollingsworth, Gregory	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2018
Jergensen, Joshua	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024
Mantri, Dinesh	Individual	Contracted Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2007
Mitchell, John	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
"How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
"How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"How do you make sure every shift actually follows each resident's care plan?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Veterans Home of California - Redding	4.5 mi	Redding, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Marquis Care at Shasta	7.8 mi	Redding, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Crestwood Wellness and Recovery Center	8.3 mi	Redding, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Copper Ridge Care Center	8.9 mi	Redding, CA	★★★★★	5/5
River Valley Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP	9.7 mi	Redding, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Redding Post Acute	10.0 mi	Redding, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Vibra Hospital of Northern California D/P SNF	10.9 mi	Redding, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Quartz Hill Post Acute	11.3 mi	Redding, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Shasta View Care Center	19.4 mi	Red Bluff, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Anderson →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555147.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Oak River Rehab

3300 Franklin Street, Anderson, CA 96007 · 5303650025

Health inspection rating 5/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
☐ "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
☐ "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "How do you make sure every shift actually follows each resident's care plan?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 555147 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)