MissouriCuba

Cuba Manor INC

210 Eldon Drive, Cuba, MO 65453 · Crawford County · 90 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since Jul 22, 1996

Part of chain: JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN (56 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.64
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 15, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 15, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 15, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 15, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
May 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Dec 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Sep 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Sep 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Sep 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Sep 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 21, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023100E
202430E
202660E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.643.663.95top 48% in Missouri; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.190.490.69bottom 9% in Missouri; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.373.223.50top 39% in Missouri; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.150.330.48bottom 15% in Missouri; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)31.456.045.8top 4% in Missouri; top 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.047.842.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.93, RN 0.15, weekend 2.71. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Lincoln, JamesIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%04/01/2002
Lincoln, JudyIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%10/24/2016
Bysor, BrandonIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/21/2022
Cuba Manor, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/24/2016
Drake, TimothyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/21/2022
Leija, MaryIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE03/21/2022
Lincoln, JamesIndividualGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/21/2002
Stutts, CharlotteIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/11/2011

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Steelville Senior Living7.3 miSteelville, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
St James Living Center12.3 miSaint James, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Life Care Center of Sullivan15.2 miSullivan, MO★★★★☆4/5
Meramec Nursing15.2 miSullivan, MO★☆☆☆☆3/5
Stonebridge Owensville19.4 miOwensville, MO★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cuba →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265652.