514 Old Mount Holly Road, Stanley, NC 28164 (opens Google Maps) · Gaston County · (704) 263-1986· 106 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since Jul 23, 1987 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 25, 2024 · F-0726
The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 23, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 25, 2024 · F-0880
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 23, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · May 23, 2023 · F-0580
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 19, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · May 23, 2023 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 19, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · May 23, 2023 · F-0607
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Why it matters: Without working prevention policies, mistreatment is more likely to happen and less likely to be caught.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 19, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 25, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 12, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 10 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. F-0726
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Oct 25, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Oct 25, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 25, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Oct 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Oct 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Oct 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint · F-0758 |
| May 23, 2023 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| May 23, 2023 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| May 23, 2023 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3 | 3 | K ▲ |
| 2024 | 6 | 3 | J ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $31,967.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2024 | Fine | $31,967 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.22 | 4.01 | 3.95 | top 10% in North Carolina; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.11 | 0.64 | 0.69 | top 9% in North Carolina; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.12 | 3.56 | 3.50 | top 16% in North Carolina; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.61 | 0.41 | 0.48 | top 14% in North Carolina; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.5 | 49.0 | 45.8 | top 23% in North Carolina; top 30% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 24.0 | 45.7 | 42.9 | top 17% in North Carolina; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.13, RN 1.09, weekend 4.05.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.13 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Stanley Total Living Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abernathy, Judith | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2013 |
| Baker, Dana | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Bryant, Sharon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2008 |
| Bryant, Sharon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2008 |
| Crotts, Allison | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2015 |
| Crotts, Allison | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Defelice, Jennifer | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Defelice, Jennifer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2008 |
| Defelice, Jennifer | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2008 |
| Ensley, Ronnie | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2008 |
| Gantt, Derrick | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/05/2023 |
| Grice, Elizabeth | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Harper, Deborah | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/26/2015 |
| Kirkland, Cathy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2021 |
| Mauney, Kevin | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| McMinn, Rob | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| McMinn, Rob | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Mull, Sandra | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/16/1997 |
| Neely, Teresa | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2008 |
| Nelson, John | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
Showing 20 of 23 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 3 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Greens at Gastonia | 6.1 mi | Gastonia, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Peak Resources - Gastonia | 6.2 mi | Gastonia, NC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Gastonia Health & Rehab Center | 6.2 mi | Gastonia, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Courtland Terrace | 6.7 mi | Gastonia, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Juniper Gardens Center for Nursing and Rehabilitat | 6.9 mi | Gastonia, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Accordius Health at Gastonia | 8.6 mi | Gastonia, NC | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Belaire Health Care Center | 10.8 mi | Gastonia, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Charlotte Health & Rehabilitation Center | 11.2 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Greens at Lincolnton | 11.3 mi | Lincolnton, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lincolnton Rehabilitation Center | 11.7 mi | Lincolnton, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Huntersville Health & Rehabilitation Center | 12.8 mi | Huntersville, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Lakeside Health & Rehab Center | 13.0 mi | Huntersville, NC | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Gaston, NC — 10 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345264.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details