FloridaLauderdale Lakes

St Johns Nursing Center

3075 NW 35th Ave, Lauderdale Lakes, FL 33311 · Broward County · 181 certified beds · avg 165 residents/day · certified since Sep 19, 1980

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$25,155
Fines, last 3 years
4.34
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 21, 2023 · F-0692

The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 21, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 21, 2023 · F-0693

The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.

Why it matters: Unnecessary or poorly managed feeding tubes can cause serious complications like lung infections and take away the ability to eat normally.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 21, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 3, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 21, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Sep 21, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Sep 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 12).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2022100D
202342G ▲
2025120D
202620F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $25,155.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 21, 2023Fine$25,155

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.344.033.95top 20% in Florida; top 28% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.890.760.69top 28% in Florida; top 22% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.973.683.50top 20% in Florida; top 24% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.550.530.48top 37% in Florida; top 27% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)14.441.445.8top 2% in Florida; top 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)23.146.042.9top 12% in Florida; top 18% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.05, RN 0.83, weekend 3.71. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Archdiocese of Miami INCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/09/1979
Archdiocese of Miami INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%08/09/1979
St Johns Rehabilitation Hospital and Nursing Center INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%08/09/1979
Archdiocese of Miami INCOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/09/1979
Bailey, RosemarieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
Bailey, RosemarieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2025
Catholic Health Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/04/1986
Catholic Health Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2025
Frick, MaryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2024
Jules, ClintonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Jules, ClintonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2025
St Johns Rehabilitation Hospital and Nursing Center INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2025
Wilson, LauraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Palms Care Center and Rehab1.1 miLauderdale Lakes, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Life Care Center at Inverrary1.7 miLauderhill, FL★★★★☆3/5
Nspire Healthcare Lauderhill1.8 miLauderhill, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Plantation Nursing & Rehabilitation Center2.6 miPlantation, FL★★★★★4/5
Wilton Manors Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center3.0 miWilton Manors, FL★★★★☆3/5
Nspire Healthcare Plantation3.1 miPlantation, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Pearl at Fort Lauderdale Rehabilitation and Nursin4.3 miFort Lauderdale, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Springtree Rehabilitation & Health Care Center4.4 miSunrise, FL★★★★★3/5
Nspire Healthcare Tamarac4.4 miTamarac, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Broward Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation4.6 miPlantation, FL★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lauderdale Lakes →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105371.