613 1st Ave SW, Hankinson, ND 58041 (opens Google Maps) · Richland County · (701) 242-7891· 34 certified beds · avg 31 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1978 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Jun 13, 2024 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 9, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Jun 13, 2024 · F-0610
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Why it matters: When allegations aren't investigated, harm to residents can continue unchecked.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 9, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 10 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. F-0600
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 7 | 2 | K ▲ |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $48,233.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2024 | Fine | $48,233 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | North Dakota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.84 | 5.15 | 3.95 | bottom 33% in North Dakota; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.80 | 1.09 | 0.69 | bottom 20% in North Dakota; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.14 | 4.43 | 3.50 | bottom 33% in North Dakota; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.41 | 0.59 | 0.48 | bottom 17% in North Dakota; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 34.2 | 48.8 | 45.8 | top 19% in North Dakota; top 22% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 44.4 | 40.3 | 42.9 | bottom 36% in North Dakota; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.67, RN 0.77, weekend 4.00.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.67 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for St Gerard's Community of Care. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Church related
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Franciscan Sisters of Dillingen | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 08/28/1995 |
| Belisle, Patricia | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2004 |
| Foertsch, Jill | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2013 |
| Foertsch, Jill | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/14/2026 |
| Hovel, Loren | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Lies, Steven | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1989 |
| Roggenbuck, Elaine Marie | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/09/2018 |
| Schafer, Nancy | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Strand, Duane | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2010 |
| The Franciscan Sisters of Dillingen | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/1995 |
| The Franciscan Sisters of Dillingen | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/14/2026 |
All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Catherines Living Center | 20.3 mi | Wahpeton, ND | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| St Francis Home | 20.5 mi | Breckenridge, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Traverse Care Center | 26.9 mi | Wheaton, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Tekakwitha Living Center | 28.5 mi | Sisseton, SD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Browns Valley Health Center | 32.9 mi | Browns Valley, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Four Seasons Health Care INC | 35.3 mi | Forman, ND | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 355038.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details