New YorkSyracuse

St Camillus Residential Health Care Facility

813 Fay Road, Syracuse, NY 13219 · Onondaga County · 284 certified beds · avg 251 residents/day · certified since Mar 3, 1969

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$39,754
Fines, last 3 years
3.29
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 22, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 1, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Jan 22, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Nov 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Nov 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Jul 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202110D
2023120E
202411G ▲
2026100E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $39,754.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 22, 2024Fine$39,754

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.293.583.95bottom 43% in New York; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.400.680.69bottom 14% in New York; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.733.133.50bottom 32% in New York; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.160.480.48bottom 5% in New York; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)37.440.345.8top 47% in New York; top 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)52.039.842.9bottom 22% in New York; bottom 32% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.49, RN 0.43, weekend 2.89. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Balduzzi, TracyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Barber, KathrynIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Bishop, JeanneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Boris, TraciIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Cappuccilli, PeterIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Catanzarita, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Chapman, GeorgeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Chase, EileenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Conole, CharlesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Cullen, LindsayIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Drapola, BarbaraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Fernandez, MicheleIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Hill, TimothyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Hines McGriff, WandaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2016
Ignacio, RenanteIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2021
Ignacio, RenanteIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/12/2025
Kopp, RichardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Maestri, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
McClurg, ScottIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Page, NancyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Upstate University Hosp at Community General T C U2.7 miSyracuse, NY★★★★★5/5
Van Duyn Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing2.9 miSyracuse, NY—/5abuseSFF
Central Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center3.0 miSyracuse, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center3.9 miSyracuse, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Loretto Health and Rehabilitation Center4.2 miSyracuse, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Iroquois Nursing Home INC5.3 miJamesville, NY★★★★☆3/5
Nottingham R H C F6.2 miJamesville, NY★★★★★5/5
Elderwood at Liverpool6.3 miLiverpool, NY★★☆☆☆3/5
Jewish Home of Central New York6.6 miSyracuse, NY★★☆☆☆1/5
Sunnyside Care Center10.0 miEast Syracuse, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
Syracuse Home Association10.2 miBaldwinsville, NY★★★★★5/5
Onondaga Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing11.1 miMinoa, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Syracuse →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335283.