813 Fay Road, Syracuse, NY 13219 (opens Google Maps) · Onondaga County · (315) 488-2951· 284 certified beds · avg 251 residents/day · certified since Mar 3, 1969 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 22, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 1, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 24 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint F-0550
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint F-0812
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint · F-0554 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Jan 22, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint · F-0804 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals. · from a complaint · F-0810 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint · F-0919 |
| Jul 30, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 10).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 12 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 10 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $39,754.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2024 | Fine | $39,754 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.29 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 43% in New York; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.40 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 14% in New York; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.73 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 32% in New York; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.16 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 5% in New York; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.4 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 47% in New York; top 30% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 52.0 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 22% in New York; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.49, RN 0.43, weekend 2.89.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.49 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for St Camillus Residential Health Care Facility. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balduzzi, Tracy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Barber, Kathryn | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Bishop, Jeanne | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2011 |
| Boris, Traci | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Cappuccilli, Peter | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Catanzarita, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Chapman, George | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Chase, Eileen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| Conole, Charles | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Cullen, Lindsay | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Drapola, Barbara | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Fernandez, Michele | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Hill, Timothy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Hines McGriff, Wanda | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2016 |
| Ignacio, Renante | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Ignacio, Renante | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/12/2025 |
| Kopp, Richard | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Maestri, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| McClurg, Scott | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Page, Nancy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
Showing 20 of 27 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 7 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upstate University Hosp at Community General T C U | 2.7 mi | Syracuse, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Van Duyn Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 2.9 mi | Syracuse, NY | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| Central Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.0 mi | Syracuse, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.9 mi | Syracuse, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Loretto Health and Rehabilitation Center | 4.2 mi | Syracuse, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Iroquois Nursing Home INC | 5.3 mi | Jamesville, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Nottingham R H C F | 6.2 mi | Jamesville, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Elderwood at Liverpool | 6.3 mi | Liverpool, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Jewish Home of Central New York | 6.6 mi | Syracuse, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Sunnyside Care Center | 10.0 mi | East Syracuse, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Syracuse Home Association | 10.2 mi | Baldwinsville, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Onondaga Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 11.1 mi | Minoa, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Onondaga, NY — 14 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335283.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details