KentuckyAnnville

Signature Healthcare at Jackson Manor Rehab and We

96 Highway 3444, Annville, KY 40402 · Jackson County · 51 certified beds · avg 48 residents/day · certified since Mar 12, 1991

Part of chain: SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE (67 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.42
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
May 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 25, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Sep 25, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 25, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 25, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 25, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Sep 25, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Sep 25, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 28, 2019F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Mar 28, 2019F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
Mar 28, 2019F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Mar 28, 2019F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 28, 2019F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 28, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201960F
202070E
202310D
202520D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKentucky avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.423.713.95top 47% in Kentucky; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.200.740.69top 7% in Kentucky; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.833.273.50bottom 39% in Kentucky; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.570.530.48top 29% in Kentucky; top 25% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)75.046.445.8bottom 4% in Kentucky; bottom 3% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)71.441.842.9bottom 9% in Kentucky; bottom 11% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.04, RN 1.42, weekend 3.35. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Asbr Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/01/2018
Jjla LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/01/2015
LPSNF LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/01/2015
SHC LP Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/01/2015
Steier III, ElmerIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/01/2015
Wheaten LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/01/2015
Dodd, SarahIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Harrison, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2007
Steier III, ElmerIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2007

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Landmark of Laurel Creek Rehabilitation and Nursin12.1 miManchester, KY★★★☆☆3/5
Laurel Heights Home for the Elderly14.8 miLondon, KY★★★★★5/5
Owsley County Health Care Center, INC.17.9 miBooneville, KY★★★★☆5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Annville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185249.