Sierra View Care Center

Name: Sierra View Care Center
Address: 14318 OHIO STREET, Baldwin Park, CA, 91706, US
Telephone: 6269601971

14318 Ohio Street, Baldwin Park, CA 91706 · Los Angeles County · 98 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since Jan 15, 1975 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: DAVID JOHNSON (48 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.52

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (45)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 24, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Apr 24, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 24, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 24, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Apr 24, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 24, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Apr 24, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Apr 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Apr 24, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 9, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Aug 4, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint
Feb 21, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 21, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Feb 21, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Feb 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Feb 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Feb 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Feb 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit.
Feb 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Feb 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jun 3, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 16, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Feb 16, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Feb 16, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 16, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 16, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 16, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Feb 16, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Feb 16, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 16, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 16, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 16, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Feb 16, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Feb 16, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 16, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 16, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 16, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Feb 16, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Feb 16, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
Feb 16, 2024	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (13 → 10).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2024	20	E
2025	14	E
2026	11	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.52	4.31	3.95	bottom 11% in California; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.31	0.61	0.69	bottom 13% in California; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.16	3.90	3.50	bottom 10% in California; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.17	0.51	0.48	bottom 6% in California; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	19.3	36.7	45.8	top 6% in California; top 2% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	25.0	38.1	42.9	top 26% in California; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.07, RN 0.36, weekend 3.66. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Sierra View Care Holdings LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	10/30/2008
Casa/Sierra California Associates LP	Organization	5% or Greater Security Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	02/11/2025
Casa/Sierra California Associates LP	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/11/2025
Cibc Bank USA	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/08/2025
Dehghanmanesh, Adrian	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2021
Dehghanmanesh, Adrian	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2021
Dehghanmanesh, Adrian	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2021
Farrales, Mary	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Farrales, Mary	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Johnson, Frank	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	06/10/2008
Johnson, Frank	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/10/2008
Johnson, Frank	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/10/2008
Khedia, Sanjay	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/30/2018
Khedia, Sanjay	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/08/2025
Kochek, Joshua	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2022
Kochek, Joshua	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2022
Kwok, Whitney	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/27/2018
Kwok, Whitney	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/27/2018
Oxford, Micheal	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/03/2022
Oxford, Micheal	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/03/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
"How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Coast Care Convalescent Center	0.2 mi	Baldwin Park, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Victoria Care Center	1.4 mi	Baldwin Park, CA	★★★★★	4/5
West Covina Healthcare Center	1.8 mi	West Covina, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Garden View Post Acute Rehabilitation	1.8 mi	Baldwin Park, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
West Covina Medical Center D/P SNF	2.0 mi	West Covina, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
West Haven Healthcare	2.2 mi	West Covina, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Clara Baldwin Stocker Home for Women	2.7 mi	West Covina, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
The Gardens of el Monte	2.9 mi	El Monte, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Santa Fe Lodge	3.0 mi	El Monte, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Mayflower Care Center	3.0 mi	El Monte, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Royal Terrace Healthcare	3.0 mi	Duarte, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Beacon Healthcare Center	3.0 mi	West Covina, CA	★★★★★	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Baldwin Park →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 056466.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Sierra View Care Center

14318 Ohio Street, Baldwin Park, CA 91706 · 6269601971

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
☐ "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 056466 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)