Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF
3828 Delmas Terrace, Culver City, CA 90232 · Los Angeles County · 21 certified beds · avg 16 residents/day · certified since Jun 29, 2012
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Sep 10, 2024 · F-0584 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Why it matters: An unsafe or unclean environment affects residents' health, comfort, and dignity every single day.
Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.
Corrected: Sep 24, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, repeated · Sep 12, 2024 · F-0610 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Why it matters: When allegations aren't investigated, harm to residents can continue unchecked.
Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.
Corrected: Oct 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 12, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Oct 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (33)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Feb 27, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. |
| Feb 27, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 27, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Feb 27, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| Feb 27, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Dec 15, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. |
| Dec 15, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Dec 15, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. |
| Dec 15, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. |
| Dec 15, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Dec 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. |
| Dec 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. |
| Dec 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. |
| Dec 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Dec 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. |
| Dec 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. |
| Dec 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Dec 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them. |
| Dec 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. |
| Dec 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. |
| Dec 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Oct 2, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint |
| Sep 12, 2024 | ▲ H · Actual harm, repeated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint |
| Sep 12, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Sep 12, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint |
| Sep 10, 2024 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint |
| Dec 3, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. |
| Dec 3, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. |
| Dec 3, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Dec 3, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. |
| Dec 3, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (16 → 5).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 21 | 3 | L ▲ |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2024 | Payment Denial | 28 days from Sep 27, 2024 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 0.00 | 4.31 | 3.95 | — |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.69 | — |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 0.00 | 3.90 | 3.50 | — |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.00 | 0.51 | 0.48 | — |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 0.0 | 36.7 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 38.1 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 0.00, RN 0.00, weekend 0.00. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alta Hospitals System LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 08/08/2007 |
| Chamber INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/01/2021 |
| David & Alexa Topper Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/31/2012 |
| Ivy Holdings INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/31/2012 |
| Ivy Intermediate Holding INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/31/2012 |
| Lee, Sang Bum | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/31/2012 |
| MPT of Culver City PMH, L.P. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/23/2019 |
| MPT of Hollywood PMH, L.P. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/23/2019 |
| MPT of Van Nuys PMH, L.P. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/23/2019 |
| Prospect Medical Holdings INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/31/2012 |
| Southern California Healthcare System, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 05/29/1998 |
| Katiraie, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/23/2025 |
| Lee, Sang Bum | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/07/2014 |
| Sabillo, Alfredo | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/21/2020 |
| Sabillo, Alfredo | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/21/2020 |
| Sabillo, Alfredo | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/20/2025 |
| Samuels, Eric | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/03/2019 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "How do your actual daily staffing levels compare to what's reported on Medicare's Care Compare website?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What percentage of your residents and staff are vaccinated against flu and pneumonia, and how do you offer the vaccines?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overland Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP | 0.6 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Cheviot Hills Post Acute | 0.6 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Marina Pointe Healthcare & Subacute | 1.7 mi | Culver City, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Meadowbrook Behavioral Health Center | 1.7 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Vista Del Sol Care Center | 1.9 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Marycrest Manor | 2.0 mi | Culver City, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Mar Vista Country Villa Healthcare & Wellness | 2.2 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Flower Villa, INC | 2.2 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Culver West Health Center | 2.3 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pavilion on Pico Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP | 2.6 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| West Pico Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre LP | 2.7 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Longwood Manor Conv.hospital | 3.1 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Culver City →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555874.